13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson ?????:> On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov <dm at belkam.com> wrote: >> zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D > > File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured), which I presumed > you were referring to. > > There is only so much a system can do to protect users against > themselves, If you insist on deleting underlying files on a brick and > not triggering a full heal then I suggest you have crossed that line. >There are two types of corruption: 1. hardware failure, to prevent this we use hardware raid6 right now, this is quite good, imho; 2. human errors, this is what I'm talking about here.
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
2016-Jul-13 05:19 UTC
[Gluster-users] 3.7.13, index healing broken?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov <dm at belkam.com> wrote:> 13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson ?????: > >> On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov <dm at belkam.com> wrote: >> >>> zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D >>> >> >> File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured), which I presumed >> you were referring to. >> >> There is only so much a system can do to protect users against >> themselves, If you insist on deleting underlying files on a brick and >> not triggering a full heal then I suggest you have crossed that line. >> >> There are two types of corruption: > > 1. hardware failure, to prevent this we use hardware raid6 right now, this > is quite good, imho; > 2. human errors, this is what I'm talking about here. > > I think classic solution for human errors is snapshots. Which is presentin gluster. Feel free to give us feedback. -- Pranith -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160713/dc7f89e8/attachment.html>