On 8/07/2016 8:40 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:> If performance would be the same with 10MB shard or 100MB shard, the > 10MB is better because allows a faster healing.Depends on what performance measures you use. In my ad hoc testing, my impressions where that large seq read/write slowed down as shard size shrunk, but oddly, random i/o actually increased. For me, the happy medium is 64MB. But it will depend on your workload. -- Lindsay Mathieson
2016-07-08 13:19 GMT+02:00 Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com>:> Depends on what performance measures you use. In my ad hoc testing, my > impressions where that large seq read/write slowed down as shard size > shrunk, but oddly, random i/o actually increased.How did you mesure the performance? I would like to test in the same way, so that results are comparable. Which network/hardware/servers topology are you using ?