Jorick Astrego
2016-Jan-27 12:14 UTC
[Gluster-users] RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG-Storage not valid for current packages?
On 01/27/2016 12:59 PM, Jorick Astrego wrote:> Hi, > > Currently I'm trying to upgrade our ovirt/glusterfs/katello cluster > but I'm having troubles with the gpg key. > > In Katello I put the GPG key > (/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG-Storage) that gets install by > "centos-release-gluster36-1.0-3.el7.centos.noarch" > > But I'm getting: > > Retrieving key from > https://******/katello/api/repositories/100/gpg_key_content > > > The GPG keys listed for the "GlusterFS36 7 x86_64" repository are > already installed but they are not correct for this package. > Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository. > > > Failing package is: glusterfs-libs-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > https://******/katello/api/repositories/100/gpg_key_content > > When I check the package on the Katello server, I get this signature: > > glusterfs-server-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 > NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#d5dc52dc) > > What are the correct GPG keys for 3.6.7 from the storage sig repo > (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.6/) ?Sorry, checked signature of glusterfs-server not libs, but they are the same: rpm -K glusterfs-libs-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm glusterfs-libs-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#d5dc52dc) Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae Virtualization Experts ---------------- Tel: 053 20 30 270 info at netbulae.eu Staalsteden 4-3A KvK 08198180 Fax: 053 20 30 271 www.netbulae.eu 7547 TA Enschede BTW NL821234584B01 ---------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160127/f077f8cc/attachment.html>
Jorick Astrego
2016-Jan-27 12:20 UTC
[Gluster-users] RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG-Storage not valid for current packages?
On 01/27/2016 01:14 PM, Jorick Astrego wrote:> > > On 01/27/2016 12:59 PM, Jorick Astrego wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Currently I'm trying to upgrade our ovirt/glusterfs/katello cluster >> but I'm having troubles with the gpg key. >> >> In Katello I put the GPG key >> (/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG-Storage) that gets install >> by "centos-release-gluster36-1.0-3.el7.centos.noarch" >> >> But I'm getting: >> >> Retrieving key from >> https://******/katello/api/repositories/100/gpg_key_content >> >> >> The GPG keys listed for the "GlusterFS36 7 x86_64" repository are >> already installed but they are not correct for this package. >> Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository. >> >> >> Failing package is: glusterfs-libs-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64 >> GPG Keys are configured as: >> https://******/katello/api/repositories/100/gpg_key_content >> >> When I check the package on the Katello server, I get this signature: >> >> glusterfs-server-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 >> NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#d5dc52dc) >> >> What are the correct GPG keys for 3.6.7 from the storage sig repo >> (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.6/) ? > Sorry, checked signature of glusterfs-server not libs, but they are > the same: > > rpm -K glusterfs-libs-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > glusterfs-libs-3.6.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 > NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#d5dc52dc) > >Found it, my bad. I repurposed the Katello repo and switched it to the centos storage SIG. But this repo (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.6/) is still on " glusterfs 3.6.6. Previously, I synced newer packages from the glusterfs repo sot things got messed up. <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.6/glusterfs-3.6.6-1.el7.x86_64.rpm> Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae Virtualization Experts ---------------- Tel: 053 20 30 270 info at netbulae.eu Staalsteden 4-3A KvK 08198180 Fax: 053 20 30 271 www.netbulae.eu 7547 TA Enschede BTW NL821234584B01 ---------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160127/e373e611/attachment.html>