Roman
2015-Oct-14 12:20 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster 4.0 - upgrades & backward compatibility strategy
Hi, Its hard to comment plans and things like these, but I suggest everyone will be happy to have a possibility to upgrade from 3 to 4 without new installation, OK with offline upgrade also (shut down volumes and upgrade). And I'm somehow pretty sure, that this upgrade process should be pretty flawless so no one under any circumstances would need any kind of rollbacks, so there should not be any IFs :) 2015-10-07 8:32 GMT+03:00 Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>:> Hi All, > > Over the course of the design discussion, we got a chance to discuss > about the upgrades and backward compatibility strategy for Gluster 4.0 > and here is what we came up with: > > 1. 4.0 cluster would be separate from 3.x clusters. Heterogeneous > support won't be available. > > 2. All CLI interfaces exposed in 3.x would continue to work with 4.x. > > 3. ReSTful APIs for all old & new management actions. > > 4. Upgrade path from 3.x to 4.x would be necessary. We need not support > rolling upgrades, however all data layouts from 3.x would need to be > honored. Our upgrade path from 3.x to 4.x should not be cumbersome. > > > Initiative wise upgrades strategy details: > > GlusterD 2.0 > ------------ > > - No rolling upgrade, service disruption is expected > - Smooth upgrade from 3.x to 4.x (migration script) > - Rollback - If upgrade fails, revert back to 3.x, old configuration > data shouldn't be wiped off. > > > DHT 2.0 > ------- > - No in place upgrade to DHT2 > - Needs migration of data > - Backward compat, hence does not exist > > NSR > --- > - volume migration from AFR to NSR is possible with an offline upgrade > > We would like to hear from the community about your opinion on this > strategy. > > Thanks, > Atin > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-- Best regards, Roman. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20151014/8b7c8b0f/attachment.html>
Atin Mukherjee
2015-Oct-15 03:14 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster 4.0 - upgrades & backward compatibility strategy
On 10/14/2015 05:50 PM, Roman wrote:> Hi, > > Its hard to comment plans and things like these, but I suggest everyone > will be happy to have a possibility to upgrade from 3 to 4 without new > installation, OK with offline upgrade also (shut down volumes and > upgrade). And I'm somehow pretty sure, that this upgrade process should > be pretty flawless so no one under any circumstances would need any kind > of rollbacks, so there should not be any IFs :)Just to clarify that there will be and has to be an upgrade path. That's what I mentioned in point 4 in my mail. The only limitation would be here is no rolling upgrade support.> > 2015-10-07 8:32 GMT+03:00 Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com > <mailto:amukherj at redhat.com>>: > > Hi All, > > Over the course of the design discussion, we got a chance to discuss > about the upgrades and backward compatibility strategy for Gluster 4.0 > and here is what we came up with: > > 1. 4.0 cluster would be separate from 3.x clusters. Heterogeneous > support won't be available. > > 2. All CLI interfaces exposed in 3.x would continue to work with 4.x. > > 3. ReSTful APIs for all old & new management actions. > > 4. Upgrade path from 3.x to 4.x would be necessary. We need not support > rolling upgrades, however all data layouts from 3.x would need to be > honored. Our upgrade path from 3.x to 4.x should not be cumbersome. > > > Initiative wise upgrades strategy details: > > GlusterD 2.0 > ------------ > > - No rolling upgrade, service disruption is expected > - Smooth upgrade from 3.x to 4.x (migration script) > - Rollback - If upgrade fails, revert back to 3.x, old configuration > data shouldn't be wiped off. > > > DHT 2.0 > ------- > - No in place upgrade to DHT2 > - Needs migration of data > - Backward compat, hence does not exist > > NSR > --- > - volume migration from AFR to NSR is possible with an offline upgrade > > We would like to hear from the community about your opinion on this > strategy. > > Thanks, > Atin > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Roman.