Prashanth Pai
2015-Aug-05 10:40 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Non-Uniform opErrstr output in all gluster --xml commands
Having (null) is not common in xml convention. Usually, it's either <opErrstr/> or <opErrstr></opErrstr> Regards, -Prashanth Pai ----- Original Message -----> From: "Avra Sengupta" <asengupt at redhat.com> > To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, gluster-users at gluster.org, > kauffman at cs.uchicago.edu, "Dusmant Kumar Pati" <dpati at redhat.com>, "Shubhendu Tripathi" <shtripat at redhat.com>, > msvbhat at redhat.com > Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 3:16:10 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Non-Uniform opErrstr output in all gluster --xml commands > > On 08/05/2015 03:06 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On 08/05/2015 02:58 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> As reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218732, in > >> the event where there is no opErrstr, some gluster commands'(like > >> snapshot status, volume status etc.) xml output shows > >> "<opErrstr>(null)</opErrstr>", while other commands show just > >> "<opErrstr/>". This non-uniform output is troublesome for people who > >> parse this. > >> > >> IMHO showing "<opErrstr>(null)</opErrstr>" is much more descriptive. I > >> would like to propose making sure all commands follow this uniform > >> approach, instead of displaying just "<opErrstr/>". > > Makes sense to me as long as its uniform. However the existing ones > > which follow "<opErrstr/>" need change in parsing logic : > To attain uniformity, one or the other parsing logic will break. we > might as well get it right for once. > >> Regards, > >> Avra > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gluster-devel mailing list > >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel at gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
Avra Sengupta
2015-Aug-05 10:50 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Non-Uniform opErrstr output in all gluster --xml commands
In that case will stick with <opErrstr/> for all the null elements. On 08/05/2015 04:10 PM, Prashanth Pai wrote:> Having (null) is not common in xml convention. Usually, it's either > > <opErrstr/> > > or > > <opErrstr></opErrstr> > > Regards, > -Prashanth Pai > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Avra Sengupta" <asengupt at redhat.com> >> To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, gluster-users at gluster.org, >> kauffman at cs.uchicago.edu, "Dusmant Kumar Pati" <dpati at redhat.com>, "Shubhendu Tripathi" <shtripat at redhat.com>, >> msvbhat at redhat.com >> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 3:16:10 PM >> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Non-Uniform opErrstr output in all gluster --xml commands >> >> On 08/05/2015 03:06 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>> On 08/05/2015 02:58 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218732, in >>>> the event where there is no opErrstr, some gluster commands'(like >>>> snapshot status, volume status etc.) xml output shows >>>> "<opErrstr>(null)</opErrstr>", while other commands show just >>>> "<opErrstr/>". This non-uniform output is troublesome for people who >>>> parse this. >>>> >>>> IMHO showing "<opErrstr>(null)</opErrstr>" is much more descriptive. I >>>> would like to propose making sure all commands follow this uniform >>>> approach, instead of displaying just "<opErrstr/>". >>> Makes sense to me as long as its uniform. However the existing ones >>> which follow "<opErrstr/>" need change in parsing logic : >> To attain uniformity, one or the other parsing logic will break. we >> might as well get it right for once. >>>> Regards, >>>> Avra >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>