Gluster users - Aug 2015 - Very slow ls

In my current configuration I have a distributed and replicated volume
which is (to my understanding) similar to a raid 10.

On 04.08.2015 08:51, Mathieu Chateau wrote:
> In a replicated scheme, it's like a raid 1 (mirror).
> You write as slow as the slowest disk. Client will wait for all brick
> writes confirmation.
> 
> In this scheme, you wouldn't much more than 3 bricks.
> 
> I think you mox up with distributed scheme, which is like a raid 0
stripped.
> This one get more perf when adding bricks. But a single file is
> present only in one brick.

Sorry only read replicated in your first mail, I squashed the distributed
one :'(



Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://www.lotp.fr

2015-08-04 9:47 GMT+02:00 Florian Oppermann <gluster-users at
flopwelt.de>:
> In my current configuration I have a distributed and replicated volume
> which is (to my understanding) similar to a raid 10.
>
> On 04.08.2015 08:51, Mathieu Chateau wrote:
> > In a replicated scheme, it's like a raid 1 (mirror).
> > You write as slow as the slowest disk. Client will wait for all brick
> > writes confirmation.
> >
> > In this scheme, you wouldn't much more than 3 bricks.
> >
> > I think you mox up with distributed scheme, which is like a raid 0
> stripped.
> > This one get more perf when adding bricks. But a single file is
> > present only in one brick.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150804/da593305/attachment.html>