Geoffrey Letessier
2015-Jul-22 07:17 UTC
[Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp
Hi Rafi, It?s what I do. But I note particularly this kind of trouble when I mount my volumes manually. In addition, when I changed my transport-type from tcp or rdma to tcp,rdma, I have had to restart my volume in order they can took effect. I wonder if these trouble are not due to RDMA protocol? because it looks like more stable with TCP one. Another idea? Thanks for replying and by advance, Geoffrey ------------------------------------------------------ Geoffrey Letessier Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr Le 22 juil. 2015 ? 07:33, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> a ?crit :> > > On 07/22/2015 04:51 AM, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: >> Hi Niels, >> >> Thanks for replying. >> >> In fact, after having checked the log, I've discovered GlusterFS tried to connect a brick with a TCP (or RDMA) port allocated to another volume? (bug?) >> For example, here is a extract of my workdir.log file : >> [2015-07-21 21:34:01.820188] E [socket.c:2332:socket_connect_finish] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: connection to 10.0.4.1:49161 failed (Connexion refus?e) >> [2015-07-21 21:34:01.822563] E [socket.c:2332:socket_connect_finish] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: connection to 10.0.4.1:49162 failed (Connexion refus?e) >> >> But the 2 ports (49161 and 49162) concerned only my vol_home volume, not the vol_workdir_amd one. >> >> Now, after having restart all glusterd synchronously (pdsh -w cl-storage[1-4] service glusterd restart), all seems to be back into a normal situation (size, write permission, etc.) >> >> But, a few minutes later, i note a strange thing I notice since i?ve upgraded my cluster storage from 3.5.3 to 3.7.2-3: when I try to mount some volume (particularly my vol_shared volume (replicated volume)) my system can hang? And, because I use it in my bashrc file for my environment modules, i need to restart my node. Idem if I try to do a DF on my mounted volume (if it doesn?t hang during the mount). >> >> With TCP transport-type, the situation seems to be more stable.. >> >> In addition: If I restart a storage node, I can?t use Gluster CLI (it also hang). >> >> Do you have an idea? > > Are you using bash script to start/mount the volume ? If so, add a sleep after volume start and mount, to allow all the process to start properly. Because RDMA protocol will take some time to init the resources. > > Regards > Rafi KC > > > >> >> One more time, thanks a lot for your help, >> Geoffrey >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> Geoffrey Letessier >> Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me >> UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique >> Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique >> 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris >> Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr >> >> Le 21 juil. 2015 ? 23:49, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> a ?crit : >> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:20:20PM +0200, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: >>>> Hello Soumya, Hello everybody, >>>> >>>> network.ping-timeout was set to 42 seconds. I set it to 0 but no >>>> difference. The problem was, after having re-set le transport-type to >>>> rdma,tcp some brick down after a few minutes.. Despite of restarting >>>> volumes, after a few minutes, some [other/different] bricks down >>>> again. >>> >>> I'm not sure how if the ping-timeout is differently handled when RDMA is >>> used. Adding two of the guys that know RDMA well on CC. >>> >>>> Now, after re-creation of my volume, bricks keep alive but, oddly, i?m >>>> not able to write on my volume. In addition, I defined a distributed >>>> volume with 2 servers, 4 bricks of 250GB each and my final volume >>>> seems to be only sized to 500GB? It?s amazing.. >>> >>> As seen further below, the 500GB volume is caused by two unreachable >>> bricks. When the bricks are not reachable, the size of the bricks can >>> not be detected by the client and therefore 2x 250 GB is missing. >>> >>> It is unclear to me why writing to a pure distributed volume fails. When >>> a brick is not reachable, and the file should be created there, it >>> would normally get created on an other brick. When the brick that should >>> have the file gets online, and a new lookup for the file is done, a so >>> called "link file" is created, which points to the file on the other >>> brick. I guess the failure has to do with the connection issues, and I >>> would suggest to get that solved first. >>> >>> HTH, >>> Niels >>> >>> >>>> Here you can find some information: >>>> # gluster volume status vol_workdir_amd >>>> Status of volume: vol_workdir_amd >>>> Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Brick ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>> ck1/data 49185 49186 Y 23098 >>>> Brick ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>> ck1/data 49158 49159 Y 3886 >>>> Brick ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>> ck2/data 49187 49188 Y 23117 >>>> Brick ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>> ck2/data 49160 49161 Y 3905 >>>> >>>> # gluster volume info vol_workdir_amd >>>> >>>> Volume Name: vol_workdir_amd >>>> Type: Distribute >>>> Volume ID: 087d26ea-c6df-4cbe-94af-ecd87b59aedb >>>> Status: Started >>>> Number of Bricks: 4 >>>> Transport-type: tcp,rdma >>>> Bricks: >>>> Brick1: ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/brick1/data >>>> Brick2: ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/brick1/data >>>> Brick3: ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/brick2/data >>>> Brick4: ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/brick2/data >>>> Options Reconfigured: >>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on >>>> >>>> # pdsh -w storage[1,3] df -h /export/brick_workdir/brick{1,2} >>>> storage3: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>> storage3: /dev/mapper/st--block1-blk1--workdir >>>> storage3: 250G 34M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick1 >>>> storage3: /dev/mapper/st--block2-blk2--workdir >>>> storage3: 250G 34M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick2 >>>> storage1: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>> storage1: /dev/mapper/st--block1-blk1--workdir >>>> storage1: 250G 33M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick1 >>>> storage1: /dev/mapper/st--block2-blk2--workdir >>>> storage1: 250G 33M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick2 >>>> >>>> # df -h /workdir/ >>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>> localhost:vol_workdir_amd.rdma >>>> 500G 67M 500G 1% /workdir >>>> >>>> # touch /workdir/test >>>> touch: impossible de faire un touch ? /workdir/test ?: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type >>>> >>>> # tail -30l /var/log/glusterfs/workdir.log >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:33.927673] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.877231] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: changing port to 49173 (from 0) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.880556] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: changing port to 49174 (from 0) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.914661] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1021 peer:10.0.4.1:49173) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.923535] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.883925] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: changing port to 49173 (from 0) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.887085] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: changing port to 49174 (from 0) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.919394] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1021 peer:10.0.4.1:49173) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.932622] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.682636] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.682947] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683240] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683472] W [dht-diskusage.c:48:dht_du_info_cbk] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: failed to get disk info from vol_workdir_amd-client-0 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683506] W [dht-diskusage.c:48:dht_du_info_cbk] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: failed to get disk info from vol_workdir_amd-client-2 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683532] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683551] W [fuse-bridge.c:1970:fuse_create_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 18: /test => -1 (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683619] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683846] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.886807] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: changing port to 49173 (from 0) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.893059] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: changing port to 49174 (from 0) >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.920434] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1021 peer:10.0.4.1:49173) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.925292] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>> >>>> I use GlusterFS in production since around 3 years without any block >>>> problem but now the situation is awesome since more than 3 weeks? >>>> Indeed, our production are down since roughly 3.5 weeks (with a lot >>>> and different problems with GlusterFS v3.5.3 and now with 3.7.2-3) and >>>> i need to restart it? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> Geoffrey >>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Geoffrey Letessier >>>> Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me >>>> UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique >>>> Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique >>>> 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris >>>> Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr >>>> >>>> Le 21 juil. 2015 ? 19:36, Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com> a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> From the following errors, >>>>> >>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.495321] I [MSGID: 114020] [client.c:2118:notify] 0-vol_shared-client-0: parent translators are ready, attempting connect on transport >>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.498989] W [socket.c:923:__socket_keepalive] 0-socket: failed to set TCP_USER_TIMEOUT 0 on socket 12, Protocole non disponible >>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.499004] E [socket.c:3015:socket_connect] 0-vol_shared-client-0: Failed to set keep-alive: Protocole non disponible >>>>> >>>>> looks like setting TCP_USER_TIMEOUT value to 0 on the socket failed with error (IIUC) "Protocol not available". >>>>> Could you check if 'network.ping-timeout' is set to zero for that volume using 'gluster volume info'? Anyways from the code looks like 'TCP_USER_TIMEOUT' can take value zero. Not sure why it has failed. >>>>> >>>>> Niels, any thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Soumya >>>>> >>>>> On 07/21/2015 08:15 PM, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: >>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.495321] I [MSGID: 114020] [client.c:2118:notify] >>>>>> 0-vol_shared-client-0: parent translators are ready, attempting connect >>>>>> on transport >>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.498989] W [socket.c:923:__socket_keepalive] >>>>>> 0-socket: failed to set TCP_USER_TIMEOUT 0 on socket 12, Protocole non >>>>>> disponible >>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.499004] E [socket.c:3015:socket_connect] >>>>>> 0-vol_shared-client-0: Failed to set keep-alive: Protocole non disponible >>>> >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150722/12ecd264/attachment.html>
Geoffrey Letessier
2015-Jul-22 07:25 UTC
[Gluster-users] Change transport-type on volume from tcp to rdma, tcp
? And, after a moment (a few minutes after having restarted my back-transfert of around 40TB), my volume fall down (and all my rsync too): [root at atlas ~]# df -h /mnt df: ? /mnt ?: Noeud final de transport n'est pas connect? df: aucun syst?me de fichiers trait? aka "transport endpoint is not connected ? Geoffrey ------------------------------------------------------ Geoffrey Letessier Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr Le 22 juil. 2015 ? 09:17, Geoffrey Letessier <geoffrey.letessier at cnrs.fr> a ?crit :> Hi Rafi, > > It?s what I do. But I note particularly this kind of trouble when I mount my volumes manually. > > In addition, when I changed my transport-type from tcp or rdma to tcp,rdma, I have had to restart my volume in order they can took effect. > > I wonder if these trouble are not due to RDMA protocol? because it looks like more stable with TCP one. > > Another idea? > Thanks for replying and by advance, > Geoffrey > ------------------------------------------------------ > Geoffrey Letessier > Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me > UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique > Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique > 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris > Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr > > Le 22 juil. 2015 ? 07:33, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> a ?crit : > >> >> >> On 07/22/2015 04:51 AM, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: >>> Hi Niels, >>> >>> Thanks for replying. >>> >>> In fact, after having checked the log, I've discovered GlusterFS tried to connect a brick with a TCP (or RDMA) port allocated to another volume? (bug?) >>> For example, here is a extract of my workdir.log file : >>> [2015-07-21 21:34:01.820188] E [socket.c:2332:socket_connect_finish] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: connection to 10.0.4.1:49161 failed (Connexion refus?e) >>> [2015-07-21 21:34:01.822563] E [socket.c:2332:socket_connect_finish] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: connection to 10.0.4.1:49162 failed (Connexion refus?e) >>> >>> But the 2 ports (49161 and 49162) concerned only my vol_home volume, not the vol_workdir_amd one. >>> >>> Now, after having restart all glusterd synchronously (pdsh -w cl-storage[1-4] service glusterd restart), all seems to be back into a normal situation (size, write permission, etc.) >>> >>> But, a few minutes later, i note a strange thing I notice since i?ve upgraded my cluster storage from 3.5.3 to 3.7.2-3: when I try to mount some volume (particularly my vol_shared volume (replicated volume)) my system can hang? And, because I use it in my bashrc file for my environment modules, i need to restart my node. Idem if I try to do a DF on my mounted volume (if it doesn?t hang during the mount). >>> >>> With TCP transport-type, the situation seems to be more stable.. >>> >>> In addition: If I restart a storage node, I can?t use Gluster CLI (it also hang). >>> >>> Do you have an idea? >> >> Are you using bash script to start/mount the volume ? If so, add a sleep after volume start and mount, to allow all the process to start properly. Because RDMA protocol will take some time to init the resources. >> >> Regards >> Rafi KC >> >> >> >>> >>> One more time, thanks a lot for your help, >>> Geoffrey >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> Geoffrey Letessier >>> Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me >>> UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique >>> Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique >>> 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris >>> Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr >>> >>> Le 21 juil. 2015 ? 23:49, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> a ?crit : >>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:20:20PM +0200, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: >>>>> Hello Soumya, Hello everybody, >>>>> >>>>> network.ping-timeout was set to 42 seconds. I set it to 0 but no >>>>> difference. The problem was, after having re-set le transport-type to >>>>> rdma,tcp some brick down after a few minutes.. Despite of restarting >>>>> volumes, after a few minutes, some [other/different] bricks down >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how if the ping-timeout is differently handled when RDMA is >>>> used. Adding two of the guys that know RDMA well on CC. >>>> >>>>> Now, after re-creation of my volume, bricks keep alive but, oddly, i?m >>>>> not able to write on my volume. In addition, I defined a distributed >>>>> volume with 2 servers, 4 bricks of 250GB each and my final volume >>>>> seems to be only sized to 500GB? It?s amazing.. >>>> >>>> As seen further below, the 500GB volume is caused by two unreachable >>>> bricks. When the bricks are not reachable, the size of the bricks can >>>> not be detected by the client and therefore 2x 250 GB is missing. >>>> >>>> It is unclear to me why writing to a pure distributed volume fails. When >>>> a brick is not reachable, and the file should be created there, it >>>> would normally get created on an other brick. When the brick that should >>>> have the file gets online, and a new lookup for the file is done, a so >>>> called "link file" is created, which points to the file on the other >>>> brick. I guess the failure has to do with the connection issues, and I >>>> would suggest to get that solved first. >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> Niels >>>> >>>> >>>>> Here you can find some information: >>>>> # gluster volume status vol_workdir_amd >>>>> Status of volume: vol_workdir_amd >>>>> Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Brick ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>>> ck1/data 49185 49186 Y 23098 >>>>> Brick ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>>> ck1/data 49158 49159 Y 3886 >>>>> Brick ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>>> ck2/data 49187 49188 Y 23117 >>>>> Brick ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/bri >>>>> ck2/data 49160 49161 Y 3905 >>>>> >>>>> # gluster volume info vol_workdir_amd >>>>> >>>>> Volume Name: vol_workdir_amd >>>>> Type: Distribute >>>>> Volume ID: 087d26ea-c6df-4cbe-94af-ecd87b59aedb >>>>> Status: Started >>>>> Number of Bricks: 4 >>>>> Transport-type: tcp,rdma >>>>> Bricks: >>>>> Brick1: ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/brick1/data >>>>> Brick2: ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/brick1/data >>>>> Brick3: ib-storage1:/export/brick_workdir/brick2/data >>>>> Brick4: ib-storage3:/export/brick_workdir/brick2/data >>>>> Options Reconfigured: >>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on >>>>> >>>>> # pdsh -w storage[1,3] df -h /export/brick_workdir/brick{1,2} >>>>> storage3: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>>> storage3: /dev/mapper/st--block1-blk1--workdir >>>>> storage3: 250G 34M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick1 >>>>> storage3: /dev/mapper/st--block2-blk2--workdir >>>>> storage3: 250G 34M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick2 >>>>> storage1: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>>> storage1: /dev/mapper/st--block1-blk1--workdir >>>>> storage1: 250G 33M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick1 >>>>> storage1: /dev/mapper/st--block2-blk2--workdir >>>>> storage1: 250G 33M 250G 1% /export/brick_workdir/brick2 >>>>> >>>>> # df -h /workdir/ >>>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>>> localhost:vol_workdir_amd.rdma >>>>> 500G 67M 500G 1% /workdir >>>>> >>>>> # touch /workdir/test >>>>> touch: impossible de faire un touch ? /workdir/test ?: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type >>>>> >>>>> # tail -30l /var/log/glusterfs/workdir.log >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:33.927673] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.877231] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: changing port to 49173 (from 0) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.880556] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: changing port to 49174 (from 0) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.914661] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1021 peer:10.0.4.1:49173) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:37.923535] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.883925] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: changing port to 49173 (from 0) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.887085] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: changing port to 49174 (from 0) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.919394] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1021 peer:10.0.4.1:49173) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:41.932622] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.682636] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.682947] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683240] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683472] W [dht-diskusage.c:48:dht_du_info_cbk] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: failed to get disk info from vol_workdir_amd-client-0 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683506] W [dht-diskusage.c:48:dht_du_info_cbk] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: failed to get disk info from vol_workdir_amd-client-2 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683532] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683551] W [fuse-bridge.c:1970:fuse_create_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 18: /test => -1 (Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683619] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:44.683846] W [dht-layout.c:189:dht_layout_search] 0-vol_workdir_amd-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1072520554 >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.886807] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: changing port to 49173 (from 0) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.893059] I [rpc-clnt.c:1819:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: changing port to 49174 (from 0) >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.920434] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-0: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1021 peer:10.0.4.1:49173) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> [2015-07-21 21:10:45.925292] W [rdma.c:1263:gf_rdma_cm_event_handler] 0-vol_workdir_amd-client-2: cma event RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED, error 8 (me:10.0.4.1:1020 peer:10.0.4.1:49174) >>>>> Host Unreachable, Check your connection with IPoIB >>>>> >>>>> I use GlusterFS in production since around 3 years without any block >>>>> problem but now the situation is awesome since more than 3 weeks? >>>>> Indeed, our production are down since roughly 3.5 weeks (with a lot >>>>> and different problems with GlusterFS v3.5.3 and now with 3.7.2-3) and >>>>> i need to restart it? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>> Geoffrey >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Geoffrey Letessier >>>>> Responsable informatique & ing?nieur syst?me >>>>> UPR 9080 - CNRS - Laboratoire de Biochimie Th?orique >>>>> Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique >>>>> 13, rue Pierre et Marie Curie - 75005 Paris >>>>> Tel: 01 58 41 50 93 - eMail: geoffrey.letessier at ibpc.fr >>>>> >>>>> Le 21 juil. 2015 ? 19:36, Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com> a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> From the following errors, >>>>>> >>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.495321] I [MSGID: 114020] [client.c:2118:notify] 0-vol_shared-client-0: parent translators are ready, attempting connect on transport >>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.498989] W [socket.c:923:__socket_keepalive] 0-socket: failed to set TCP_USER_TIMEOUT 0 on socket 12, Protocole non disponible >>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.499004] E [socket.c:3015:socket_connect] 0-vol_shared-client-0: Failed to set keep-alive: Protocole non disponible >>>>>> >>>>>> looks like setting TCP_USER_TIMEOUT value to 0 on the socket failed with error (IIUC) "Protocol not available". >>>>>> Could you check if 'network.ping-timeout' is set to zero for that volume using 'gluster volume info'? Anyways from the code looks like 'TCP_USER_TIMEOUT' can take value zero. Not sure why it has failed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Niels, any thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Soumya >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/21/2015 08:15 PM, Geoffrey Letessier wrote: >>>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.495321] I [MSGID: 114020] [client.c:2118:notify] >>>>>>> 0-vol_shared-client-0: parent translators are ready, attempting connect >>>>>>> on transport >>>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.498989] W [socket.c:923:__socket_keepalive] >>>>>>> 0-socket: failed to set TCP_USER_TIMEOUT 0 on socket 12, Protocole non >>>>>>> disponible >>>>>>> [2015-07-21 14:36:30.499004] E [socket.c:3015:socket_connect] >>>>>>> 0-vol_shared-client-0: Failed to set keep-alive: Protocole non disponible >>>>> >>> >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150722/7f0143b0/attachment.html>