On 04/11/2015 02:25 PM, Andreas Hollaus wrote:> Hi and thanks,
>
> Well, I guess I didn't explain my problem particularly well. Sorry for
> that.
>
> I guess that a normal gluster user would in the beginning add the
> replica bricks required and then, whenever the servers restarts, let
> gluster restart using the same configuration files as before the
> restart. Restarts would happen again and again, without any manual
> interaction changing the storage configuration. Every time you add a
> brick, you would need to sync the new brick for it to be a replica of
> the other bricks and that would take some time.
>
> My case is worse. When setting up this replicated file system, I would
> do the same. However, at an early stage of every server restart I would
> need to make the local brick available to my clients on all servers.
> That means before the servers get in contact with each other.
>
> At this stage, I would like to have a volume which is not replicated on
> every server. After a while, these single brick volumes would be dropped
> and replaced by the replicated volume I used before the restart.
>
> All these stages (and volumes) I describe would make use of the same
> physical storage place (bricks). As long as no writing is involved with
> the single brick volumes, I wouldn't risk ending up in a split brain
> situation when I restore the replicated volume.
>
> Restoring the volume would be done by keeping a backup of the
> configuration files which define the replicated volume. Restarting the
> gluster daemons using these configuration files would restore the
> replicated volume without having to add any bricks. The reason I don't
> want to add the brick at each restart, is that it would mean some
> penalty to sync the new brick. That new brick already contains all the
> necessary files from the time before the server restart.
>
> Sorry for this complex and strange way of using glusterfs, but my task
> is to try to find a way to use it given a set of fixed use cases that we
> have. I know that this is not an easy thing to do, but I would at least
> want to find some way to implement this (good or bad). I think it's
> possible, but it may be too inefficient to be a good solution.
>
> So, back to my original question: Would this 'gluster volume create
> myvol local_IP:/path/to/brick' affect the data or meta-data on the
brick
> in any way? I think that is the most critical command in the chain, as I
> don't expect starting or mounting the volume to affect anything. I want
> to avoid affecting the (meta-)data as I intend to restore the replicated
> volume I used before the restart without gluster noticing that the brick
> was actually used in another configuration in between.
Answer to your question is "partially yes", though it doesn't
affect the
data residing in the brick but it resets all of its meta data and set
new extended attributes.>
>
> Regards
> Andreas
>
>
> On 04/11/2015 09:18 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>>
>> On 04/11/2015 01:21 AM, Andreas Hollaus wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder what happens when the command 'gluster volume
create...' is
>>> executed? How is the file system on the brick affected by that
command,
>>> data and meta-data (extended attributes)?
>>>
>>> The reason for this question is that I have a strange use case
where my
>>> 2 (mirrored) servers are restarted. At an early stage of the reboot
>>> phase, I have to create a new gluster file system on each server so
that
>>> the same directory can be used for read access. Later on, I would
like
>>> to delete these single server volumes and replace them with the
mirrored
>>> gluster volume I used before the restart.
>>>
>>> I guess I can restore the previous volume definition from a backup
of
>>> the gluster configuration files, but I'm worried that the
'gluster
>>> volume create...' command might have affected the brick so that
it is in
>>> a different state compared to before the restart, when the restored
>>> gluster configuration was valid. I realize that for this to work,
the
>>> extended attributes can not change while the mirrored volume is
stopped.
>>>
>>> Any idea if I can use glusterfs like this or am I violating some
rules?
>> If I've understood your requirement correctly you are trying to
convert
>> a distributed volume into a replicate one. In that case you would need
>> to convert it through add brick mentioned the replica count. I
don't
>> think you would face any issues for restoring configurations if all the
>> steps are performed correctly.
>>
>> ~Atin
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Andreas
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>
>
--
~Atin