Alessandro Ipe
2015-Feb-23 13:34 UTC
[Gluster-users] rm -rf some_dir results in "Directory not empty"
Hi Ravi,
gluster volume status md1 returns
Status of volume: md1
Gluster process Port Online Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick tsunami1:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49157 Y 2260
Brick tsunami2:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49152 Y 2320
Brick tsunami3:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49156 Y 20715
Brick tsunami4:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49156 Y 10544
Brick tsunami5:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49152 Y 12588
Brick tsunami6:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49152 Y 12242
Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A Y 2336
Self-heal Daemon on tsunami2 N/A Y 2359
Self-heal Daemon on tsunami5 N/A Y 27619
Self-heal Daemon on tsunami4 N/A Y 12318
Self-heal Daemon on tsunami3 N/A Y 19118
Self-heal Daemon on tsunami6 N/A Y 27650
Task Status of Volume md1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Task : Rebalance
ID : 9dfee1a2-49ac-4766-bdb6-00de5e5883f6
Status : completed
so it seems that all brick server are up.
gluster volume heal md1 info returns
Brick tsunami1.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/
Number of entries: 0
Brick tsunami2.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/
Number of entries: 0
Brick tsunami3.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/
Number of entries: 0
Brick tsunami4.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/
Number of entries: 0
Brick tsunami5.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/
Number of entries: 0
Brick tsunami6.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/
Number of entries: 0
Should I run "gluster volume heal md1 full" ?
Thanks,
A.
On Monday 23 February 2015 18:12:43 Ravishankar N wrote:
On 02/23/2015 05:42 PM, Alessandro Ipe wrote:
Hi,
We have a "md1" volume under gluster 3.5.3 over 6 servers
configured as
distributed and replicated. When trying on a client, thourgh fuse mount
(which
turns out to be also a brick server) to delete (as root) recursively a
directory
with "rm -rf /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1", I get the error
messages
rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/KDE4.7.4/i586?: Directory
not
empty
rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/src-oss/suse/src?:
Directory not
empty
rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/noarch?: Directory
not
empty
rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/i586?: Directory
not
empty
(the same occurs as unprivileged user but with "Permission
denied".)
while a "ls -Ral /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1" gives me
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1:
total 0
drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 gerb users 245 Feb 23 12:55 ..
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 95 Feb 23 13:03 KDE4.7.4
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 311 Feb 20 16:57 oss
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 86 Feb 20 16:20 src-oss
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/KDE4.7.4:
total 28
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 95 Feb 23 13:03 .
drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 ..
d--------- 2 root root 61452 Feb 23 13:03 i586
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/KDE4.7.4/i586:
total 28
d--------- 2 root root 61452 Feb 23 13:03 .
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 95 Feb 23 13:03 ..
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss:
total 0
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 311 Feb 20 16:57 .
drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 ..
drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 suse
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse:
total 536
drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 .
drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 311 Feb 20 16:57 ..
d--------- 2 root root 368652 Feb 23 13:03 i586
d--------- 2 root root 196620 Feb 23 13:03 noarch
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/i586:
total 360
d--------- 2 root root 368652 Feb 23 13:03 .
drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 ..
/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/noarch:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150223/096c29b5/attachment.html>
Ravishankar N
2015-Feb-23 14:36 UTC
[Gluster-users] rm -rf some_dir results in "Directory not empty"
On 02/23/2015 07:04 PM, Alessandro Ipe wrote:> > Hi Ravi, > > gluster volume status md1 returns > > Status of volume: md1 > > Gluster process Port Online Pid > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Brick tsunami1:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49157 Y 2260 > > Brick tsunami2:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49152 Y 2320 > > Brick tsunami3:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49156 Y 20715 > > Brick tsunami4:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49156 Y 10544 > > Brick tsunami5:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49152 Y 12588 > > Brick tsunami6:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 49152 Y 12242 > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A Y 2336 > > Self-heal Daemon on tsunami2 N/A Y 2359 > > Self-heal Daemon on tsunami5 N/A Y 27619 > > Self-heal Daemon on tsunami4 N/A Y 12318 > > Self-heal Daemon on tsunami3 N/A Y 19118 > > Self-heal Daemon on tsunami6 N/A Y 27650 > > Task Status of Volume md1 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Task : Rebalance > > ID : 9dfee1a2-49ac-4766-bdb6-00de5e5883f6 > > Status : completed > > so it seems that all brick server are up. > > gluster volume heal md1 info returns > > Brick tsunami1.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/ > > Number of entries: 0 > > Brick tsunami2.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/ > > Number of entries: 0 > > Brick tsunami3.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/ > > Number of entries: 0 > > Brick tsunami4.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/ > > Number of entries: 0 > > Brick tsunami5.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/ > > Number of entries: 0 > > Brick tsunami6.oma.be:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1/ > > Number of entries: 0 > > Should I run "gluster volume heal md1 full" ? >Hi Alessandro, Looks like there is no pending-self heals, so no need to run the heal command. Can you share the output of the client (mount) log when you get the ENOTEMPTY during the rm -rf? What version of gluster are you using? Thanks, Ravi> Thanks, > > A. > > On Monday 23 February 2015 18:12:43 Ravishankar N wrote: > > > On 02/23/2015 05:42 PM, Alessandro Ipe wrote: > > Hi, > > We have a "md1" volume under gluster 3.5.3 over 6 servers configured > as distributed and replicated. When trying on a client, thourgh fuse > mount (which turns out to be also a brick server) to delete (as root) > recursively a directory with "rm -rf /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1", I > get the error messages > > rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/KDE4.7.4/i586?: > Directory not empty > > rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/src-oss/suse/src?: > Directory not empty > > rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/noarch?: > Directory not empty > > rm: cannot remove ?/home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/i586?: > Directory not empty > > (the same occurs as unprivileged user but with "Permission denied".) > > while a "ls -Ral /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1" gives me > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1: > > total 0 > > drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 . > > drwxr-xr-x 6 gerb users 245 Feb 23 12:55 .. > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 95 Feb 23 13:03 KDE4.7.4 > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 311 Feb 20 16:57 oss > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 86 Feb 20 16:20 src-oss > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/KDE4.7.4: > > total 28 > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 95 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 .. > > d--------- 2 root root 61452 Feb 23 13:03 i586 > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/KDE4.7.4/i586: > > total 28 > > d--------- 2 root root 61452 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 95 Feb 23 13:03 .. > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss: > > total 0 > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 311 Feb 20 16:57 . > > drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 .. > > drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 suse > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse: > > total 536 > > drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 311 Feb 20 16:57 .. > > d--------- 2 root root 368652 Feb 23 13:03 i586 > > d--------- 2 root root 196620 Feb 23 13:03 noarch > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/i586: > > total 360 > > d--------- 2 root root 368652 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 .. > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/oss/suse/noarch: > > total 176 > > d--------- 2 root root 196620 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 4 gerb users 90 Feb 23 13:03 .. > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/src-oss: > > total 0 > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 86 Feb 20 16:20 . > > drwxrwxrwx 5 gerb users 151 Feb 20 16:22 .. > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 48 Feb 23 13:03 suse > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/src-oss/suse: > > total 220 > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 48 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 86 Feb 20 16:20 .. > > d--------- 2 root root 225292 Feb 23 13:03 src > > /home/.md1/linux/suse/12.1/src-oss/suse/src: > > total 220 > > d--------- 2 root root 225292 Feb 23 13:03 . > > drwxrwxrwx 3 gerb users 48 Feb 23 13:03 .. > > Is there a cure such as manually forcing a healing on that directory ? > > > Are all bricks up? Are there any pending self-heals ? Does `gluster > volume heal md1` info show any output? If it does, run 'gluster volume > heal md1' to manually trigger heal. > -Ravi > > Many thanks, > > Alessandro. > > gluster volume info md1 outputs: > > Volume Name: md1 > > Type: Distributed-Replicate > > Volume ID: 6da4b915-1def-4df4-a41c-2f3300ebf16b > > Status: Started > > Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 > > Transport-type: tcp > > Bricks: > > Brick1: tsunami1:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 > > Brick2: tsunami2:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 > > Brick3: tsunami3:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 > > Brick4: tsunami4:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 > > Brick5: tsunami5:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 > > Brick6: tsunami6:/data/glusterfs/md1/brick1 > > Options Reconfigured: > > performance.write-behind: on > > performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB > > performance.flush-behind: off > > performance.io-thread-count: 64 > > performance.cache-size: 512MB > > nfs.disable: on > > features.quota: off > > cluster.read-hash-mode: 2 > > server.allow-insecure: on > > cluster.lookup-unhashed: off > > > > _______________________________________________Gluster-users mailing > listGluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150223/492c099e/attachment.html>