Gluster users - Feb 2015 - "gluster volume heal info" giving wrong report

Hi All,

Can any one clarify the issue e , we are facing with "heal" incorrect 
report mentioned below , We are using gluster 3.3.2 .

*Issue:*

*Bug 1039544* <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039544> 
-[FEAT] "gluster volume heal info" should list the entries that
actually
required to be healed.

*Steps to recreate*

If we are continuously writing to a file in a volume. At the same time 
if we do the following

# gluster volume replace-bricks $vol_name $old_brick $new_brick commit force

# gluster volume heal $vol_name full

#gluster volume $vol_name info      --> this shows that the Numer of 
files=1, even though the file is already healed.

*Related issues:*

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user/14188

*Fix:*

http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7480/

*Query:*

Is the fix that we are trying to back port to gluster 3.2 is the correct 
code changes.

Regards,

Subrata
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150213/f43372d5/attachment.html>

AFR team (Pranith/Ravi cced), FYA..

~Atin

On 02/13/2015 07:48 PM, Subrata Ghosh wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Can any one clarify the issue e , we are facing with "heal"
incorrect
> report mentioned below , We are using gluster 3.3.2 .
> 
> *Issue:*
> 
> *Bug 1039544* <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039544>
> -[FEAT] "gluster volume heal info" should list the entries that
actually
> required to be healed.
> 
> *Steps to recreate*
> 
> If we are continuously writing to a file in a volume. At the same time
> if we do the following
> 
> # gluster volume replace-bricks $vol_name $old_brick $new_brick commit
> force
> 
> # gluster volume heal $vol_name full
> 
> #gluster volume $vol_name info      --> this shows that the Numer of
> files=1, even though the file is already healed.
> 
> *Related issues:*
> 
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user/14188
> 
> *Fix:*
> 
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7480/
> 
> *Query:*
> 
> Is the fix that we are trying to back port to gluster 3.2 is the correct
> code changes.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Subrata
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
-- 
~Atin