Gluster users - Oct 2013 - performance.cache-size survey

A quick survey:

What do you have your performance.cache-size set to?

We have the luxury of decently specced workstations (24GB RAM minimum
spec, up to 128GB for some boxs), and set our performance.cache-size
to 2048MB (2GB) for some pleasant results with our large-ish files
that we throw about to fuse.glusterfs clients.

VMs and lower specced machines mount up via NFS instead, so they don't
take the RAM hit.

-- 
Dan Mons
R&D SysAdmin
Unbreaker of broken things
Cutting Edge
http://cuttingedge.com.au

We are using 256MB for our cache size on (for the moment) m1.large AWS 
instances with Ubuntu 12.04LTS.

I have started poking around for any other cool tweeks and 
performance/security improvements.

Brian Silverwood
Systems Administrator
Viddler | Viddler.com <http://www.viddler.com> | 215-962-5829
Subscribe to the Viddler blog <http://blog.viddler.com>
On 10/31/2013 06:16 PM, Dan Mons wrote:
> A quick survey:
>
> What do you have your performance.cache-size set to?
>
> We have the luxury of decently specced workstations (24GB RAM minimum
> spec, up to 128GB for some boxs), and set our performance.cache-size
> to 2048MB (2GB) for some pleasant results with our large-ish files
> that we throw about to fuse.glusterfs clients.
>
> VMs and lower specced machines mount up via NFS instead, so they don't
> take the RAM hit.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131101/5627dec8/attachment.html>