Hi. I found the following link when searching for GlusterFS: http://highscalability.com/product-glusterfs Please check the comments in this post, where people reflect quite negative about GlusterFS stability in production enviroment. Now, i didn't sent this email with any intention to insult the developers, just wanted to know, and to suggest: 1) They speak about older versions, about 8 months ago. Any idea if the mentioned issues were fixed in 2.0? 2) If they were, I suggest to post a comment updating this status. This page comes quite high in results, and may not form the correct impression for the starting users. Just my suggestion. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090317/1bbcbec6/attachment.html>
Vikas Gorur
2009-Mar-18 06:24 UTC
[Gluster-users] GlusterFS non-favorably stability review
2009/3/17 Stas Oskin <stas.oskin at gmail.com>:> Hi. > > I found the following link when searching for GlusterFS: > > http://highscalability.com/product-glusterfs > > Please check the comments in this post, where people reflect quite negative > about GlusterFS stability in production enviroment.Both the negative comments there are ad hominem, to which there is no need to respond. The only technical issue mentioned is the protocol overhead, which might have been an issue with the 1.x releases (because they used an ASCII protocol), but no longer, as we've moved to a binary protocol. Vikas -- Engineer - Z Research http://gluster.com/