Lyle Johnson
2005-Apr-28 10:45 UTC
[fxruby-users] Re: innaccurate/misleading portrayal of project on rubyforge
On 4/28/05, Sander Jansen <s.jansen@gmail.com> wrote:> Hmmm, never seen so much crap on that page, since somebody added that > nonsense about the licensing.Like anything you read on a Wiki, you have to take things with a grain of salt (sometimes, a whole shaker full). It''s very clear that "Thursday" (the anonymous poster who started this thread) has a chip on his shoulder and so in order to correct the probably unintentional mistakes he saw in the description of wxRuby, he decided to throw in some intentional FUD about FOX on the Wiki (also anonymously). For anyone who''s interested in the facts, please just go to the source. There''s a page at the FOX Web site (see http://www.fox-toolkit.com/license.html ) that describes the FOX license in detail. It is a combination of the standard LGPL and an addendum that relaxes some of the more restrictive elements of the basic LGPL; in particular, point 2(d) of the license addendum makes it clear that "... subclassing from objects or widgets supplied by the library involves no modifications to the source code of the library itself, and does not constitute creating a modified copy based on the library."