On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 05:13-0000, tech-lists wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My context is poudriere creating jails on freebsd12-stable. This procedure
> worked fine for some other jails I created a couple days ago (the 5th) but
> now, today I get buildworld failures with creating either amd64 or armv7
jails
> (the server is amd64)
>
> To try to see the failure, I set jobs to J1 like so:
>
> poudriere jail -x -J1 -c -j 12armv7 -a arm.armv7 -m svn+https -v
> stable/12
>
> It bails when it's making rescue with this error:
>
> /data/poudriere/basefs/jails/12armv7/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/pass1.c:454:13:
> error: too many arguments to function call, expected 0, have 1
> inodirty(dp);
> ~~~~~~~~ ^~
> /data/poudriere/basefs/jails/12armv7/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck.h:453:1:
> note: 'inodirty' declared here
> void inodirty(void); ^
> 1 error generated.
> *** [pass1.o] Error code 1
>
> I know that's probably not enough, so have pasted much more output at
> https://rpi3.zyxst.net/errors/poudriere-build-failure.txt
>
> not tried make buildworld yet on the host. The OS is at r344763 and
> /usr/src is at 344863
>
> Just tried it on another 12-stable desktop, straightforward make
> buildworld, same sort of error:
>
> --- all_subdir_sbin/fsdb ---
> /usr/src/sbin/fsdb/fsdb.c:1042:14: error: too many arguments to function
> call, expected 0, have 1
> inodirty(curinode);
> ~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~~~ /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck.h:453:1: note:
> 'inodirty' declared
> here
> void inodirty(void);
>
> the sources are at 344869
It's good to see I'm not the only one experiencing this issue. It
looks like r339941 was never merged to stable/12.
--
Trond.