On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 09:33, Rodney W. Grimes <freebsd at pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:> > LD?=ld.lld in the right place(s)?Perhaps, I seem to recall some issue with that, but not the specifics.> And is this still an issue for stable/12 i386? > or has ld been changed to ld.lld?stable/12 i386 still has GNU ld as /usr/bin/ld and there are a small number of ports (particularly Free Pascal ones) which fail to build with lld. They're tracked as children of PR 214864: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=214864&hide_resolved=1 The Lazarus / Free Pascal issue is in PR 233413. In my opinion we should merge the switch to lld as /usr/bin/ld to stable/12 now and iterate on fixing the remaining ports fallout, but would like re/portmgr's assent.
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 09:33, Rodney W. Grimes > <freebsd at pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > LD?=ld.lld in the right place(s)? > > Perhaps, I seem to recall some issue with that, but not the specifics.Any idea on what that issue was?> > And is this still an issue for stable/12 i386? > > or has ld been changed to ld.lld? > > stable/12 i386 still has GNU ld as /usr/bin/ld and there are a small > number of ports (particularly Free Pascal ones) which fail to build > with lld. > > They're tracked as children of PR 214864: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=214864&hide_resolved=1 > The Lazarus / Free Pascal issue is in PR 233413.Thank you, I am now cc: on PR214864> In my opinion we should merge the switch to lld as /usr/bin/ld to > stable/12 now and iterate on fixing the remaining ports fallout, but > would like re/portmgr's assent.I'll defer to gjb@ on that, but this seems reasonable from my perspective. Adding re@ to cc: list -- Rod Grimes rgrimes at freebsd.org
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 09:33, Rodney W. Grimes > <freebsd at pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > LD?=ld.lld in the right place(s)? > > Perhaps, I seem to recall some issue with that, but not the specifics.sys.mk already does a LD?=ld so by the time we try to override it in the Makefile.i386 it is too late as already defined. *sigh*> > And is this still an issue for stable/12 i386? > > or has ld been changed to ld.lld? > > stable/12 i386 still has GNU ld as /usr/bin/ld and there are a small > number of ports (particularly Free Pascal ones) which fail to build > with lld. > > They're tracked as children of PR 214864: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=214864&hide_resolved=1 > The Lazarus / Free Pascal issue is in PR 233413. > > In my opinion we should merge the switch to lld as /usr/bin/ld to > stable/12 now and iterate on fixing the remaining ports fallout, but > would like re/portmgr's assent. >-- Rod Grimes rgrimes at freebsd.org