On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:32:25PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:>If it's showing up like that then it's not an AR9170 device; it's a >broadcom firmware device. :(yeah. In tiny lettering it has "v2" next to the WNDA3100 so this seems to be a completely different chipset But what about the otus(4) manpage? Says you can compile device otus into kernel, but buildkernel says device unknown. thanks, -- J.
yeah, that we'll have to look into.. -a On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 13:33, tech-lists <tech-lists at zyxst.net> wrote:> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:32:25PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >If it's showing up like that then it's not an AR9170 device; it's a > >broadcom firmware device. :( > > yeah. In tiny lettering it has "v2" next to the WNDA3100 so this seems > to be a completely different chipset > > But what about the otus(4) manpage? Says you can compile device otus > into kernel, but buildkernel says device unknown. > > thanks, > -- > J. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless at freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe at freebsd.org > " >
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:33:01PM +0000, tech-lists wrote:>On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:32:25PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>If it's showing up like that then it's not an AR9170 device; it's a >>broadcom firmware device. :( > >yeah. In tiny lettering it has "v2" next to the WNDA3100 so this seems >to be a completely different chipset > >But what about the otus(4) manpage? Says you can compile device otus >into kernel, but buildkernel says device unknown.Seems WNDA3100 v2 has BCM4323 chip which is unsupported, drat. thanks, -- J.