People need to submit patches then. OTOH, they can all be moved to ports. IMO,
when pkgbase becomes a reality, much of this will become moot. People will be
able to mix and match base and ports packages.
---
Sent using a tiny phone keyboard.
Apologies for any typos and autocorrect.
Also, this old phone only supports top post. Apologies.
Cy Schubert
<Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com> or <cy at freebsd.org>
The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
---
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Dokuchaev
Sent: 04/10/2018 08:11
To: Warner Losh
Cc: Mark Linimon; freebsd-arch at freebsd.org; freebsd-fcp at freebsd.org;
FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List; FreeBSD Net
Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:43:33AM -0600, Warner Losh
wrote:> As far as I know, none of the drivers listed could do 1Gbps.
Right. My point was that original proposal put 10/100 drivers into one
basket, which is IMHO not fair: 10Mbps cards are rarely seen and used,
100mbps are not, just like 1000bps ones.
That said, I'm okay with deorbiting NICs that cannot do more than 10mbps.
Cards that can do at least 100mbps should stay. Following up on Ricks'
question, seeing a good example of modernization a certain driver would
help interested people/hw owners to keep drivers for their cards viable.
./danfe
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at
freebsd.org"