Miroslav Lachman
2018-Jun-22 22:03 UTC
jail related inconsistencies in FreeBSD tools parameters
Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46:> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17 +0200 "Miroslav Lachman" <000.fbsd at quip.cz> > said > >> I don't know if it is better to discuss it in jail@ or stable@ list so >> a do cross-post. >> >> FreeBSD has many jail aware utilities but they are inconsistent in >> taking JID as parameter. >> >> For example "sockstat" takes -j JID "Show only sockets belonging to >> the specified jail ID" and it means numeric ID only. >> On the other hand "ps" takes -J JID "This may be either the jid or >> name of the jail.? Use -J 0 to display only host processes." >> The same apply for "top", it understands jid as a number or name of >> the jail too. >> Then again "cpuset" takes only numerical ID of the jail... >> >> Shouldn't it be consistent across all FreeBSD base utilities so all of >> them can use numerical ID and name? > Good idea! Are you offering to create a patch? ;-) > It'd be my guess that given they weren't all created at the same time, nor > the same individual; that (quite probably?) the "jail" additions were also > added at different times, and by different people. So I'd imagine that > unless someone with a commit bit decides one day they'd like to take that > on. Someone(tm) maybe you? will need to propose a patch. :-)If I can understand C sources I will create the patch by myself instead of just posting here. Unfortunately I am able to code in sh, php and a bit of javascript and perl but no C. :) Miroslav Lachman
James Gritton
2018-Jun-23 15:30 UTC
jail related inconsistencies in FreeBSD tools parameters
On 2018-06-22 16:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote:> Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46: >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17 +0200 "Miroslav Lachman" >> <000.fbsd at quip.cz> said >> >>> I don't know if it is better to discuss it in jail@ or stable@ list >>> so a do cross-post. >>> >>> FreeBSD has many jail aware utilities but they are inconsistent in >>> taking JID as parameter. >>> >>> For example "sockstat" takes -j JID "Show only sockets belonging to >>> the specified jail ID" and it means numeric ID only. >>> On the other hand "ps" takes -J JID "This may be either the jid or >>> name of the jail.? Use -J 0 to display only host processes." >>> The same apply for "top", it understands jid as a number or name of >>> the jail too. >>> Then again "cpuset" takes only numerical ID of the jail... >>> >>> Shouldn't it be consistent across all FreeBSD base utilities so all >>> of them can use numerical ID and name? >> Good idea! Are you offering to create a patch? ;-) >> It'd be my guess that given they weren't all created at the same time, >> nor >> the same individual; that (quite probably?) the "jail" additions were >> also >> added at different times, and by different people. So I'd imagine that >> unless someone with a commit bit decides one day they'd like to take >> that >> on. Someone(tm) maybe you? will need to propose a patch. :-) > > If I can understand C sources I will create the patch by myself > instead of just posting here. Unfortunately I am able to code in sh, > php and a bit of javascript and perl but no C. :) > > Miroslav LachmanSure, a PR would be handy for this - it's a pretty simple thing to add, and consistency would indeed be a good move. - Jamie