have you tried meta builds and pkgbase?
On 3 October 2017 at 16:38, Dan Mack <mack at macktronics.com> wrote:
> Jakub Lach <jakub_lach at mailplus.pl> writes:
>
> > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench
scores
> > comparing to
> > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now)
(about
> > 40%).
> >
> > I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench
on
> -STABLE
> > since
> > 2008.
>
> Agree; clang/llvm and friends have added a lot of value. It's worth it
> I think.
>
> It is however getting harder to continue with a source based update
> model, which I prefer even though most people just use package managers
> today.
>
> I still like to read the commits and understand what's changing, why,
> and select the version I am comfortable with given the nuances of my
> configuration(s). I think that's why 'knock-on-wood' I've
been able to
> track mostly CURRENT and/or STABLE without any outages since about 1998
> on production systems :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at
freebsd.org"
>