Hi, I noticed these useful commit that I'd highly appreciate in STABLE (11 in particular) https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=307769 Is it possible?
Christian Schwarz
2017-Jan-09 15:14 UTC
Patches lost in Bugzilla: Was: Additional daemon(8) functionality in STABLE?
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:02:09PM +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:> Hi, > I noticed these useful commit that I'd highly appreciate in STABLE (11 > in particular) > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=307769 > Is it possible?Only marginally related: I submitted a similar patch in February 2016. At the time, I didn't know about the existence of Phabricator because I was one year newer to the project than today. I imagine there are lots of useful patches in Bugzilla that are just never picked up. Maybe presenting an alert in Bugzilla when submitting a report with category 'base' and an attachment 'patch' could help there... Just sayin', Christian Schwarz
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:02:09PM +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:> Hi, > I noticed these useful commit that I'd highly appreciate in STABLE (11 > in particular) > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=307769 > Is it possible? > ....Well, it looks *possible*: g1-252(11.0-S)[1] cd /usr/src g1-252(11.0-S)[2] svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: file:///svn/freebsd/src/base/stable/11 Relative URL: ^/stable/11 Repository Root: file:///svn/freebsd/src/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 311781 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: kib Last Changed Rev: 311776 Last Changed Date: 2017-01-09 02:26:02 -0800 (Mon, 09 Jan 2017) g1-252(11.0-S)[3] svn merge -c 307769 --dry-run ^/head --- Merging r307769 into '.': U usr.sbin/daemon/daemon.8 U usr.sbin/daemon/daemon.c g1-252(11.0-S)[4] uname -a FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #217 r311776M/311781:1100509: Mon Jan 9 04:57:48 PST 2017 root at g1-252.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 g1-252(11.0-S)[5] I believe that you are requesting that jilles@ consider an MFC of r307769 to stable/11. Given the above, the change appears to "fit"; I believe that someone more familiar with the code (I have not even looked) would need to judge whether or not it would actually work. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david at catwhisker.org How could one possibly "respect" a misogynist, racist, bullying jerk??!? See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 603 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20170109/7f21c6a5/attachment.sig>