freebsd stable - Aug 2016 - Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

> I'm writing from my cellphone away from my computer, so take this with
a
> grain of salt:
>
> -L/usr/local/llvm38/lib
You're missing the point. If your webserver crashes every other day,
the fact that you can run a batch job to restart it doesn't make it
OK.

No software written to date assumes the need to find libomp. It will
either configure itself to not use openmp or not build without
additional tweaking. Requiring additional tweaking to build on FreeBSD
or requiring users to install gcc is kind of underwhelming.

-M

2016-08-29 3:04 GMT+02:00 K. Macy <kmacy at freebsd.org>:
> > I'm writing from my cellphone away from my computer, so take this
with a
> > grain of salt:
> >
> > -L/usr/local/llvm38/lib
>
> You're missing the point. If your webserver crashes every other day,
> the fact that you can run a batch job to restart it doesn't make it
> OK.
>
>
Fair enough, I misunderstood the point as "clang, even from ports, cannot
do omp at all [from a shell]".

> [...] Requiring additional tweaking to build on FreeBSD
> or requiring users to install gcc is kind of underwhelming.
>
Isn't that precisely what the ports infrastructure is supposed to do? What
about compiler.mk? If it can provide an extra library-dirs argument to the
port's configure then we're not that bad. And still I agree, this is far
from an ideal situation, and we speaking about finding a library, we have
still not touched having clang use the LLVM linker...