Eric van Gyzen
2016-Aug-10 15:14 UTC
[Bug 211491] System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with iSCSI, zfs, and altroot
On 08/09/16 06:10 PM, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote:> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491 > > --- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> --- > Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list > unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit > niche right now)I'm sorry that some people were annoyed, although I wouldn't call it spam. It's a discussion of a bug that affects -STABLE, so stable@ is appropriate. Furthermore, it's a new regression that will go into 11.0-RELEASE, so getting some attention is a good thing. I imagine this is why koobs@ CC'd stable at . I thought it was limited to iSCSI, so I put that in the summary. However, we now know that it is not limited to iSCSI. I just updated the summary accordingly. Cheers, Eric
Kubilay Kocak
2016-Aug-10 15:19 UTC
[Bug 211491] System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with iSCSI, zfs, and altroot
On 11/08/2016 1:14 AM, Eric van Gyzen wrote:> On 08/09/16 06:10 PM, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491 >> >> --- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> --- >> Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list >> unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit >> niche right now) > > I'm sorry that some people were annoyed, although I wouldn't call it > spam. It's a discussion of a bug that affects -STABLE, so stable@ is > appropriate. > > Furthermore, it's a new regression that will go into 11.0-RELEASE, so > getting some attention is a good thing. I imagine this is why koobs@ > CC'd stable at .It was the original reporter CC'd, I added mfc-stable{10,11} flags in case the issue was in those branches. I'm very careful with cc'ing lists for src/base issues unless SNR is very high, high impact or it needs eyes now.> I thought it was limited to iSCSI, so I put that in the summary. > However, we now know that it is not limited to iSCSI. I just updated > the summary accordingly. > > Cheers, > > Eric