bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
2016-Aug-09 23:10 UTC
[Bug 211491] System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with iSCSI, zfs, and altroot
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491
Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|freebsd-bugs at FreeBSD.org, |ngie at FreeBSD.org
|freebsd-stable at FreeBSD.org |
Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Some People
--- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> ---
Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list
unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit
niche right now)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
George Mitchell
2016-Aug-09 23:34 UTC
[Bug 211491] System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with iSCSI, zfs, and altroot
Will someone PLEASE remove freebsd-stable from the CC list of this ticket? Thank you. -- George On 08/09/16 19:10, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote:> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491 > > Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC|freebsd-bugs at FreeBSD.org, |ngie at FreeBSD.org > |freebsd-stable at FreeBSD.org | > Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Some People > > --- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> --- > Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list > unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit > niche right now) >
Eric van Gyzen
2016-Aug-10 15:14 UTC
[Bug 211491] System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with iSCSI, zfs, and altroot
On 08/09/16 06:10 PM, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote:> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491 > > --- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper <ngie at FreeBSD.org> --- > Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list > unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit > niche right now)I'm sorry that some people were annoyed, although I wouldn't call it spam. It's a discussion of a bug that affects -STABLE, so stable@ is appropriate. Furthermore, it's a new regression that will go into 11.0-RELEASE, so getting some attention is a good thing. I imagine this is why koobs@ CC'd stable at . I thought it was limited to iSCSI, so I put that in the summary. However, we now know that it is not limited to iSCSI. I just updated the summary accordingly. Cheers, Eric