On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:39:45 +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 31.07.16 22:28, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I assumed that I had missed this in the release notes, but I can find no > > reference to this significant change that simultaneously greatly enhanced > > ipfw table functionality, but also broke my configuration. While the fix > > was trivial, if the Release Notes had addressed this, I would not have had > > the problem in the first place. > > I fixed this in r303615. Thanks for the report! Fast work Andrey, and sorry for rushing in. I ASSumed, after reading the new tables section in 11.0-R ipfw(8), that Kevin had run into: Tables require explicit creation via create before use. but diving - not too deeply - into the log of /head/sbin/ipfw/tables.c from your commit, I think that statement must be out of date, at least regarding existing ruleset table configuration? Is that right? cheers, Ian
On 01.08.16 18:43, Ian Smith wrote:> Fast work Andrey, and sorry for rushing in. I ASSumed, after reading > the new tables section in 11.0-R ipfw(8), that Kevin had run into: > > Tables require explicit creation via create before use. > > but diving - not too deeply - into the log of /head/sbin/ipfw/tables.c > from your commit, I think that statement must be out of date, at least > regarding existing ruleset table configuration? Is that right?If you want to use some new specific feature you need to create table explicitly. But for old rules generic tables will be created automatically (with warning). -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 563 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20160801/d15a4efd/attachment.sig>