freebsd stable - Jul 2016 - [Bug 210953] 11.0 -r302412 via powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to build: dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown conversion type character 'b' in format; too many arguments for format

On 2016-Jul-9, at 8:53 PM, Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 9, 2016, at 18:52, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote:
>> 
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210953
>> 
>> Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> changed:
> 
> I accidentally committed this regression to kern.mk. I don't have
bugzilla login right now. Please assign the bug to me and I'll mark it fixed
for the rev I did it in with head and stable/10.
> 
> Thanks!
> -Ngie
So far as I know I've no control over the Assignee field for any bug via
bugzilla. Someone that has such can do what Ngie requested and assign 210953 to
him.

A rebuild based on -r302457 completed fine for the powerpc64-gcc use, confirming
Ngie's note, at least for 11.0-STABLE.

I've no stable/10 context and so have not tested there. Otherwise I might
have just classified the report as "Overcome By Events" myself.

I have added a comment to 210953 about my rebuild test and Ngie's material
above.


==Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net

> On Jul 9, 2016, at 23:03, Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net>
wrote:
> 
> On 2016-Jul-9, at 8:53 PM, Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya at gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
>>> On Jul 9, 2016, at 18:52, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210953
>>> 
>>> Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> changed:
>> 
>> I accidentally committed this regression to kern.mk. I don't have
bugzilla login right now. Please assign the bug to me and I'll mark it fixed
for the rev I did it in with head and stable/10.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> -Ngie
> 
> So far as I know I've no control over the Assignee field for any bug
via bugzilla. Someone that has such can do what Ngie requested and assign 210953
to him.
> 
> A rebuild based on -r302457 completed fine for the powerpc64-gcc use,
confirming Ngie's note, at least for 11.0-STABLE.
> 
> I've no stable/10 context and so have not tested there. Otherwise I
might have just classified the report as "Overcome By Events" myself.
> 
> I have added a comment to 210953 about my rebuild test and Ngie's
material above.
stable/10 was a typo. I meant stable/11.

No worries.. I'll take care of it when I get home soon.

Thanks!
> 
> ==> Mark Millard
> markmi at dsl-only.net
>