On 2016-Jun-02 12:12:35 +0500, "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz at norma.perm.ru> wrote:>differs a lot ? And why should I prefere this overcomplicated scheme >over the geom_mirror, which seems rather simple when comparing. Seems >like I can point HAST to /dev/mirror/whatever device, right ?Because using RAID of any sort under ZFS defeats a lot of the smarts in ZFS. In particular, you can no longer rely on scrub verifying that all your media content is valid. I've also had bad experiences with gmirror volumes silently getting out of sync on a crash. -- Peter Jeremy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 949 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20160603/a2614984/attachment.sig>
03.06.2016 2:48, Peter Jeremy ?????:> On 2016-Jun-02 12:12:35 +0500, "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz at norma.perm.ru> wrote: >> differs a lot ? And why should I prefere this overcomplicated scheme >> over the geom_mirror, which seems rather simple when comparing. Seems >> like I can point HAST to /dev/mirror/whatever device, right ? > > Because using RAID of any sort under ZFS defeats a lot of the smarts > in ZFS. In particular, you can no longer rely on scrub verifying that > all your media content is valid. I've also had bad experiences with > gmirror volumes silently getting out of sync on a crash.gmirror or (gmirror+gjournal) ones?