On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2015 13:51, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:46:40PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >
> >>>> Yes in theory new requests should go to the other vdev,
but there could
> >>>> be some dependency issues preventing that such as a
syncing TXG.
> >>> Currenly this pool must not have write activity (from
application).
> >>> What about go to the other (mirror) device in the same vdev?
> >>> Same dependency?
> >> Yes, if there's an outstanding TXG, then I believe all IO will
stall.
> > Where this TXG released? When all devices in all vdevs report
> > 'completed'? When at the least one device in all vdevs report
> > 'completed'? When at the least one device in at least one vdev
report
> > 'completed'?
> When all devices have report completed or failed.
Thanks for explained.
> Hence if you pull the disk things should continue as normal, with the
> failed device being marked as such.
I am have trouble to phisical access.
May be someone can be suggest software method to forced detach device
from system.