freebsd stable - Apr 2015 - Will ASAN MFC to 10-STABLE?

On 04 Apr 2015, at 23:30, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling at kev009.com>
wrote:
> 
> I believe the last bits needed to try clang's ASAN feature is the
clang-rt stuff.  Will this MFC with a clang 3.5 or 3.6 MFC?
It depends on whether we will ever MFC the most recent version of clang
to stable/10.  Since clang 3.5.0 and later require C++11 support, doing
this will make it more difficult to upgrade from 9.x to 10.x, and not
everybody agrees that it is worth the trouble.

Once 9.x is EOL (expected at the end 2016), it might cease to be an
issue, though. :-)

-Dimitry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL:
<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20150405/6355283e/attachment.sig>

On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 04 Apr 2015, at 23:30, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling at kev009.com>
wrote:
>>
>> I believe the last bits needed to try clang's ASAN feature is the
clang-rt stuff.  Will this MFC with a clang 3.5 or 3.6 MFC?
>
> It depends on whether we will ever MFC the most recent version of clang
> to stable/10.  Since clang 3.5.0 and later require C++11 support, doing
> this will make it more difficult to upgrade from 9.x to 10.x, and not
> everybody agrees that it is worth the trouble.
>
> Once 9.x is EOL (expected at the end 2016), it might cease to be an
> issue, though. :-)
>
> -Dimitry
Do you know if the clang-rt stuff will function with clang 3.4 or were 
there changes in the compiler to accommodate FreeBSD?

Wondering if we could try and add just the clang-rt libraries since the 
end of 2016 is a long time away :)

Regards,
Kevin