On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 10:23 -0500, Paul Mather wrote:> On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:30 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas at bris.ac.uk>
wrote:
>
> > On 10.0-RELEASE-p12 amd64 I updated to p13 as:
> >
> > freebsd-update fetch
> > freebsd-update install
> > reboot
> >
> > However, uname still shows the old patchlevel:
> >
> > # uname -a
> > FreeBSD 001cc0f01814.anet.bris.ac.uk 10.0-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD
10.0-RELEASE-p12 #0: Tue Nov 4 05:07:17 UTC 2014 root at
amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> > #
> >
> > But freebsd-update fetch suggests I'm already at p13:
> >
> > # freebsd-update fetch
> > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
> > Fetching metadata signature for 10.0-RELEASE from
update5.freebsd.org... done.
> > Fetching metadata index... done.
> > Inspecting system... done.
> > Preparing to download files... done.
> >
> > No updates needed to update system to 10.0-RELEASE-p13.
> > #
> >
> > So has the update p12 -> p13 succeeded?
>
> What does "freebsd-version" report? If it returns
10.0-RELEASE-p13 then your freebsd-update succeeded.
>
> > Please clarify
>
> It's my understanding that uname only gets updated when freebsd-update
updates the kernel. I think that's why freebsd-version was introduced.
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Anton
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
>
I have similar question about the 10.1-RELEASE-p1 update
I ran the update as:
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
# ezjail-admin update -u
# reboot
Yet when I run:
# freebsd-version -ku
10.1-RELEASE
10.1-RELEASE-p1
# uname -a
FreeBSD terra.michaeleichorn.com 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0
r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014
root at releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Do I have a problem here or is this the expected behavior?
I thought that 'freebsd-version -k' would report the new patchlevel even
if there was not a kernel update.
For the record 'freebsd-update fetch' and 'freebsd-update
install'
report no updates to install.
Regards,
Ike