Hello, Freebsd-fs. My server crashed today morning due to PSU failure, and now it is checking (in foreground!) 8Tb UFS2+SU volume for 6200 seconds, and it is only "Phase 1b" (!!!). I don't want even think about background check of this FS. Is SUJ stable enough to migrate to it? It was marked as stable some time ago, and was included into 9-RELEASE, but later I seen some messages on fs@ list, that it still has some problems, and even some references to McKusick's message about this instability (but I've failed to find message itself). BTW, this check reveals many softupdate inconsistences (mostly DUPs), and most of them are in files, which was not written for sure in time of crash (old archives, which could be only read!). -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Use of SU+J & use with snapshots is being addressed. Latest update (to 9.0 Stable) was today, please refer to http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-9/2012-March/001406.html If you mean to use it in production (ie with snapshots), then it is not advisable. Regards, Dewayne.
On 29 March 2012 05:29, Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote:> Use of SU+J & use with snapshots is being addressed. Latest update (to 9.0 > Stable) was today, please refer to > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-9/2012-March/001406.html > > If you mean to use it in production (ie with snapshots), then it is not > advisable. > Regards, Dewayne. >Does anyone knows if we have news about that? Have we got a new state, like working and nice for production ? Thanks, -- Marcel Bonnet