I was able to buildworld, buildkernel to 9.0-RC1 from 8-stable without incident. Yay. However, I noticed a new sysinstall executable in /usr/sbin even though I included WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL="yes" in /etc/src.conf. My src.conf looks like it's in good order, and the other WITHOUT_ options were heeded. Thanks, Andrew Lankford PS will we be able to compile out bsdinstall and pc-sysinstall with STABLE-9?
On 31 October 2011 04:03, Andrew Lankford <lankfordandrew@charter.net> wrote:> I was able to buildworld, buildkernel to 9.0-RC1 from 8-stable without > incident. ?Yay. ?However, I noticed a new sysinstall executable ?in > /usr/sbin even though I included WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL="yes" ?in > /etc/src.conf. ?My src.conf ?looks like it's in good order, and the > other WITHOUT_ options were heeded. >You mention a new sysinstall executable, as in it was *definitely* installed by the installworld and not just left over? Is the mtime the same as others in that dir? Chris
On 10/31/2011 05:03, Andrew Lankford wrote:> I was able to buildworld, buildkernel to 9.0-RC1 from 8-stable without > incident. Yay. However, I noticed a new sysinstall executable in > /usr/sbin even though I included WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL="yes" in > /etc/src.conf. My src.conf looks like it's in good order, and the > other WITHOUT_ options were heeded. > >Looking at src/usr.sbin/Makefile*, one can see that sysinstall is *unconditionnally* built. The only effect of WITHOUT_SYSINTALL is on the build of sade. Welcome to FreeBSD quality control ! Claude Buisson