On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things. > This one's from Linux. > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1Well, it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this will make it in due time to FreeBSD's kernel.
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote: >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things. >> This one's from Linux. >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1 > > Well, > it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this will make > it in due time to FreeBSD's kernel.Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage pattern and are greatly over-hyped. P.S. What is the due time, BTW? -- Andriy Gapon
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:18:52PM +0000, Vincent Hoffman wrote:> On 19/11/2010 12:42, Eric Masson wrote: > > Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> writes: > > > > Hello, > > > >> Google suggests that the work was a GSoC project in 2005 on a pluggable > >> disk scheduler. > > It seems that something similar has found its way in DFlyBSD, dsched. > And indeed to FreeBSD, man gsched. Added sometime round April > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/geom/sched/README?view=logApart from the other comments on gsched, disk I/O scheduling is a totally different animal than {thread,process,task} scheduling, even when it comes to I/O-bound tasks. -- Clifton P.S. Trimmed -current off the CC line; crossing 3 lists seems rather superfluous. -- Clifton Royston -- cliftonr@iandicomputing.com / cliftonr@lava.net President - I and I Computing * http://www.iandicomputing.com/ Custom programming, network design, systems and network consulting services
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/392 On 11/18/10, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote: >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things. >> This one's from Linux. >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1 > > Well, > it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this > will make it in due time to FreeBSD's kernel. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >