My system is RELENG_8 and I have checkout by via csup today. It shows that utmp.h still exists in RELENG_8. But when I see this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149945 I have decided to check in the http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/?only_with_tag=RELENG_8 ... It shows that utmp.h has been removed. But in the http://sources.freebsd.org/RELENG_8/src/include/ shows a different story as it exists. I am confusing... Is it supposed to be deleted in CVS when it did the SVN->CVS? Or what? I don't have svn installed in my system at the moment, so can't check it now. Please add me in the CC as I am not in the list. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:22:22PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:> My system is RELENG_8 and I have checkout by via csup today. It shows > that utmp.h still exists in RELENG_8. But when I see this PR:> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149945> I have decided to check in the > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/?only_with_tag=RELENG_8 > ... It shows that utmp.h has been removed. But in the > http://sources.freebsd.org/RELENG_8/src/include/ shows a different > story as it exists. I am confusing... Is it supposed to be deleted in > CVS when it did the SVN->CVS? Or what? I don't have svn installed in > my system at the moment, so can't check it now.utmp.h has been removed in HEAD (9.x) but is still present in 8.x and earlier branches. It looks like cvsweb is buggy in this area. The build error in ports/149945 may be caused by a stray utmpx related file found by the configure process. Partly because the various unix variant developers have made a mess of utmp/utmpx, the code to use it is rather fragile. -- Jilles Tjoelker
On 2 October 2010 21:22, Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> wrote:> My system is RELENG_8 and I have checkout by via csup today. It shows > that utmp.h still exists in RELENG_8. But when I see this PR: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149945 > > I have decided to check in the > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/?only_with_tag=RELENG_8 > ... It shows that utmp.h has been removed. But in the > http://sources.freebsd.org/RELENG_8/src/include/ shows a different > story as it exists. I am confusing... Is it supposed to be deleted in > CVS when it did the SVN->CVS? Or what? I don't have svn installed in > my system at the moment, so can't check it now. > > Please add me in the CC as I am not in the list. >I have a suspect, cvsweb.cgi handles such case incorrectly, i.e. when file is removed in MAIN branch, but it exists in BRANCH_X, then passing the only_with_tag=RELENG_X will show such file in Attic. -- wbr, pluknet
Thanks all, it's cvsweb bug then.. Cheers, Mezz On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> wrote:> My system is RELENG_8 and I have checkout by via csup today. It shows > that utmp.h still exists in RELENG_8. But when I see this PR: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149945 > > I have decided to check in the > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/?only_with_tag=RELENG_8 > ... It shows that utmp.h has been removed. But in the > http://sources.freebsd.org/RELENG_8/src/include/ shows a different > story as it exists. I am confusing... Is it supposed to be deleted in > CVS when it did the SVN->CVS? Or what? I don't have svn installed in > my system at the moment, so can't check it now. > > Please add me in the CC as I am not in the list. > > Cheers, > Mezz > > > -- > mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD GNOME Team > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org >-- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org