freebsd stable - Apr 2010 - install touching mbr

hail,

I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to leave mbr
untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that was on control. this
options is not what I think it should, or there is really a issue here ?

thanks,

matheus

-- 
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos
wrote:
> I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to
> leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that
> was on control. this options is not what I think it should, or there
> is really a issue here ?
I can confirm this behaviour.  Someone may have broken something when
tinkering around in that part of sysinstall (since the Standard vs.
BootMgr options were moved around compared to previous releases).

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                   jdc@parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                       http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.              PGP: 4BD6C0CB |