I just noticed that my dhclient.conf file seems to be ignored in
8.0. Worked fine in 7.2.
interface "ath0" {
send host-name "slan.XXX.YYY";
prepend domain-name "XXX.YYY ";
append domain-name-servers 198.128.W.ZZ;
}
When I look at /etc/resolv.conf, neither the domain-name is added nor te
dns-server. No errors or anything else in the logs.
Anyone else see this or do I have a local problem?
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:49:33 +0000 > From: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> > > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I just noticed that my dhclient.conf file seems to be ignored in > > 8.0. Worked fine in 7.2. > > > > interface "ath0" { > > send host-name "slan.XXX.YYY"; > > prepend domain-name "XXX.YYY "; > > append domain-name-servers 198.128.W.ZZ; > > } > > > > Your interface is wrong, it should be wlanX not athX > > When I look at /etc/resolv.conf, neither the domain-name is added nor te > > dns-server. No errors or anything else in the logs. > > > > Anyone else see this or do I have a local problem?/me hangs head in shame. This change to the use of wlan0 has bitten me several places, but this is the first time I did not eventually spot it myself. Thanks, Tom. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Kevin Oberman wrote:> I just noticed that my dhclient.conf file seems to be ignored in > 8.0. Worked fine in 7.2. > > interface "ath0" { > send host-name "slan.XXX.YYY"; > prepend domain-name "XXX.YYY "; > append domain-name-servers 198.128.W.ZZ; > } >Your interface is wrong, it should be wlanX not athX> When I look at /etc/resolv.conf, neither the domain-name is added nor te > dns-server. No errors or anything else in the logs. > > Anyone else see this or do I have a local problem? >Tom