Tom Evans
2008-Feb-12 10:23 UTC
Formatting bug in C++ iostreams when running i386 binary on amd64
Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20080212/7c4118c8/attachment.pgp
Peter Jeremy
2008-Feb-12 10:54 UTC
Formatting bug in C++ iostreams when running i386 binary on amd64
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:23:18PM +0000, Tom Evans wrote:>I've encountered a strange bug deploying one of our C++ applications on >amd64. We tend to build most of our applications on i386, even if the >deployment box is amd64, as we aren't 100% sure that our code is 64 bit >clean yet. The boxes in question both run 6.2-RELEASE, at various kernel >release patchsets:...>With an i386 binary running on an amd64 host, when we write a small >double, with value close to 0.1, to a C++ iostream, it is formatted >incorrectly.See kern/102424 and amd64/112222. -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20080212/8d061d20/attachment.pgp
Tom Evans
2008-Feb-13 04:57 UTC
Formatting bug in C++ iostreams when running i386 binary on amd64
Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20080213/88675e75/attachment.pgp