freebsd stable - Nov 2007 - Missing files in listing when sharing ZFS directory over Samba

Hello list,

Has anyone else noticed files missing when browsing Samba shares of ZFS
directories?  Using both windows explorer and smbclient the file does
not show up in a directory listing but can be opened by typing the file
name by hand.  The file is of course listed when doing an ls on the
share machine.

I have updated to the RELENG_7 branch as of 30 NOV and rebuilt and
restarted Samba with no changes so far.  The ports tree is fully up to
date as well.

I don't know if this is a bug in Samba, FreeBSD, ZFS+Samba etc so if
anyone has any pointers on how to start narrowing this down they would
be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,
Jonathan

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:18:32PM +0300, Jonathan Stewart
wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed files missing when browsing Samba shares of ZFS
> directories?
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2007-11/msg00501.html

http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2007-08/msg00596.html

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/079607.html

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                    jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                           http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                      Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.                  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:18:32PM +0300, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
>> Has anyone else noticed files missing when browsing Samba shares of ZFS
>> directories?
> 
>
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2007-11/msg00501.html
This sounds like my problem except a refresh on Windows does not restore
the missing files, nor did any of the other things I mentioned in the
original email.
>
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2007-08/msg00596.html
>
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/079607.html
I remember hitting this when it first became known, the issue I have now
is different.

Thanks,
Jonathan