Are there any plans to MFC the last few commits to kern_resource.c to -STABLE? I have a number of machines which flood the logs with "calcru: negative runtime" messages every time w, ps or top is used, so im hoping these may fix the issue.
Mike Jakubik wrote:> Are there any plans to MFC the last few commits to kern_resource.c to > -STABLE? I have a number of machines which flood the logs with "calcru: > negative runtime" messages every time w, ps or top is used, so im hoping > these may fix the issue.Well, one way to help make sure that happens is to test it yourself, and report to the developers. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 18:31, Mike Jakubik wrote:> Are there any plans to MFC the last few commits to kern_resource.c to > -STABLE? I have a number of machines which flood the logs with "calcru: > negative runtime" messages every time w, ps or top is used, so im hoping > these may fix the issue.I think it involves an ABI breakage, so I doubt it. -- John Baldwin
John Baldwin wrote:> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 18:31, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >> Are there any plans to MFC the last few commits to kern_resource.c to >> -STABLE? I have a number of machines which flood the logs with "calcru: >> negative runtime" messages every time w, ps or top is used, so im hoping >> these may fix the issue. >> > > I think it involves an ABI breakage, so I doubt it. > >Thats unfortunate, as i just finished extensively testing the system with -CURRENT. There are no calcru messages, and no negative timestamps on processes occurring. In fact, everything is working perfectly. Is there anything that can be done to address this problem on -STABLE?