I have some Epox socket 939 motherboards, nvidia3 with AMD Athlon 64 and some X2 They give me a very good performance but sporadic reboots without core dumps or any other advices so I guess there is some sudden irq conflict or so I get nothing usefull by vmstat. I mount the same Nics, adaptec, mem and processor on an Asus A8V and it runs wothout any problem stable. btw I am running releng_6 I downloaded the acpi table and iasl shows me this epox.asl 2575: Name (_HID, "_NVRAIDBUS") Error 1068 - String must be entirely alphanumeric ^ (_NVRAIDBUS) Is here somebody how like to try to help me out here? You can get the files here: http://suporte.matik.com.br/epox.dsl http://suporte.matik.com.br/epox.dmesg thank's jo?o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
JoaoBR wrote:> I have some Epox socket 939 motherboards, nvidia3 with AMD Athlon 64 and some > X2 > They give me a very good performance but sporadic reboots without core dumps > or any other advices so I guess there is some sudden irq conflict or so > > I get nothing usefull by vmstat. I mount the same Nics, adaptec, mem and > processor on an Asus A8V and it runs wothout any problem stable. > > btw I am running releng_6If disabling acpi doesn't solve the problem, then it's probably not acpi.> I downloaded the acpi table and iasl shows me this > > epox.asl 2575: Name (_HID, "_NVRAIDBUS") > Error 1068 - String must be entirely alphanumeric ^ (_NVRAIDBUS) > > Is here somebody how like to try to help me out here? You can get the files > here: > > http://suporte.matik.com.br/epox.dsl > http://suporte.matik.com.br/epox.dmesgYou could get rid of the "_" anywhere NVRAIDBUS occurs. But this should have nothing to do with causing resets. -- Nate
JoaoBR wrote:> On Monday 23 January 2006 16:48, Nate Lawson wrote: > > >>>>hint.acpi_tz.0.disabled="1" >>> >>>debug.acpi.disabled=thermal >>> >>> would be the same? >> >>Yes. The first version he gave is the generic driver disabling >>mechanism, the acpi version disables all subsystems related to the >>function. It may be redundant though at this point and we might >>consider removing it. > > > well, would you mind saying which one exactly you think of for removing?Thinking of removing debug.acpi.disabled since it is mostly redundant with the hint approach. But more investigation should be done before claiming that. -- Nate