Brian Candler
2005-Sep-24 07:18 UTC
geom_mirror and ggatec/d safe for filesystem replication?
Consider the following scenario: - Machine 1 has a UFS filesystem on a block device. - It is mirrored to a block device on machine 2, using geom_mirror and ggatec/ggated - Machine 2 mounts this filesystem read only. My question is: is this last step safe? When an update occurs on machine 1, certain disk blocks will change "under the nose" of machine 2's mounts. Will all necessary caches be invalidated? (e.g. block caches, inode caches) Or could this result in nasty behaviour, up to and including panics? If so, is there a safer or better way of performing real-time filesystem replication? Thanks, Brian Candler.
Colin Farley
2005-Sep-24 14:03 UTC
geom_mirror and ggatec/d safe for filesystem replication?
I can't say if this config is safe because I don't have any exper
ieince with it. But, I can say that I use rsync to sync filesystems on
two failo filesyst the backup. network between the t normally
fairly small. for about 9 or 10 months. alternative if it is practical
for replicate.
Colin
-----owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org wrote: --
To: From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com& Sent by:
owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: 09/24/2005 09:21A Subject: geom_mirror and ggatec/d safe for
filesystem
replication?
Consider the following scenario:
- Machine 1 has a UFS filesy - It is mirrored to a block device on
machine 2, geom_mirror
and ggatec/ggated
- Machine 2 mounts this My question is: is this last step safe?
When an update occurs on machine 1, certain disk blocks will change
"under the nose" of machine 2's mounts. Will all
necessary caches be
invalidat (e.g. block caches, inode caches) Or could this result in
nasty
beha up to and including panics?
If so, is there a safer or bet filesystem
replication?
Thanks,
Brian Candler.
_________________ ______________________ 5F__
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
[1]ht To unsubscrib
"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
References
1. file://localhost/tmp/3D"ht