Mariano Benedettini
2005-Sep-14 19:08 UTC
Anyone has a 5.4-RELEASE SMP SCHED_ULE in production ?
I have a dual Xeon running 5.3-RELEASE SMP, which I plan to upgrade to 5.4, enabling SCHED_ULE. Who's running a 5.4 SMP in a production environment, using SCHED_ULE ? Is the performance significant better ? Thanks in advance, Mariano.
On 9/15/05, Mariano Benedettini <diodex@gmx.net> wrote:> I have a dual Xeon running 5.3-RELEASE SMP, which I plan to upgrade to > 5.4, enabling SCHED_ULE. > Who's running a 5.4 SMP in a production environment, using SCHED_ULE ? > Is the performance significant better ? > > Thanks in advance, > Mariano.I suggest you wait for 6.0 RELEASE and upgrade to that version. Some problems wrt ule+libpthread+smp were fixed in 6.0, but I am not sure if the changes were merged to 5.4. Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming
Oliver Brandmueller
2005-Sep-15 01:43 UTC
Anyone has a 5.4-RELEASE SMP SCHED_ULE in production ?
Hi. On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:08:01PM -0300, Mariano Benedettini wrote:> Who's running a 5.4 SMP in a production environment, using SCHED_ULE ?Only a fool :-) I suggest you better wait for some 6.x-RELEASE and an official statement about using ULE. Although ULE in RELENG_6 has a lot of fixes, ULE in RELENG_5 does not have, there are reports from time to time, that suggest, that there still might be problems with ULE in some cases. Apart from that is RELENG_6 befroe any 6.x-RELEASE probably not a good idea for a production system. - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! |