pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
Do you want to be running this way?
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:01 AM
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 113, Issue 5
Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: 5.4-RC2 freezing - ATA related? (Peter Jeremy)
2. Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? (Matthias Buelow)
3. Re: PANIC in RELENG_5 (Palle Girgensohn)
4. Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? (Igor Robul)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:12:15 +1000
From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>
Subject: Re: 5.4-RC2 freezing - ATA related?
To: Steve Watt <steve@Watt.COM>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050608101215.GH39114@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 2005-May-31 16:47:19 -0700, Steve Watt wrote:>>> The vnode locks are held by processes:
>>> PID name waiting on
>>> 487 perl [ufs c3c1c1b4]
>>> 57 syncer [snaplk c535f500] (holds 2 locks)
>>> 476 perl [ufs c87e4f1c]
>>> 489 perl [snaplk c535f500] (holds 2 locks)
>>> 3337 mksnap_ffs [getblk d77656f4]
...>This is a filesystem lock problem, not an ATA driver problem. I
analyzed>it, and posted the results to -hackers last week, with the subject
"snapshots>and innds".
I saw your previous post but the symptoms don't look the same to me.
Your deadlock has mksnap_ffs blocked on ufs whilst Elliot's problem
has mksnap_ffs blocked on getblk. getblk is a lower level call
(physical I/O) and I don't see how a FS problem could cause problems
for getblk calls.
--
Peter Jeremy
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:26:22 +0200
From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?
To: David Hogan <david@fundamentalit.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
David Hogan wrote:
> In my time with the Trustix lists, I don't think I came across a
serious> kernel issue that wasn't caused by either a lack of a preinstalled
driver or> a bad stick of ram. Would you say that this holds true for FreeBSD? I
If that Trustix works for you now well, you'd be careless to migrate
now. If it works, why change it?
My experience with the 5.x tree so far is that it's ok for a SOHO or
private environment but I wouldn't trust it if my money (or job)
depended on it. Maybe in a year, or two but not now.
mkb.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:01:08 +0200
From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: PANIC in RELENG_5
To: Kay Abendroth <kay.abendroth@raxion.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <C5742251FA6CF493BD1056F0@rambutan.pingpong.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Mine, and most others with this problem, have Dell 2850. Same ethernet
controller, though, `em'...?
/Palle
--On onsdag, juni 08, 2005 11.27.01 +0200 Kay Abendroth
<kay.abendroth@raxion.net> wrote:
> Output of 'dmesg':
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993,
1994> The Regents of the University of California. All rights
reserved.> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Fri Jun 3 08:49:22 UTC 2005
> root@susi.redhill.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SUSI
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ (1470.01-MHz 686-class CPU)
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1
>
Features=0x383fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,> MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE>
> AMD Features=0xc0400000<AMIE,DSP,3DNow!>
> real memory = 1610547200 (1535 MB)
> avail memory = 1568534528 (1495 MB)
> mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: ^\^A
> npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
> npx0: INT 16 interface
> acpi0: <KT400 AWRDACPI> on motherboard
> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on
acpi0
> cpu0: <ACPI CPU (3 Cx states)> on acpi0
> acpi_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0
> pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
> pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
> agp0: <VIA 8377 (Apollo KT400/KT400A/KT600) host to PCI bridge> mem
> 0xe0000000-0xe3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0
> pcib1: <PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0
> pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
> pci0: <display, VGA> at device 8.0 (no driver attached)
> xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd07f mem
> 0xe7060000-0xe706007f irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0
> miibus0: <MII bus> on xl0
> ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> on miibus0
> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:75:73:e3:ad
> pci0: <network, ethernet> at device 11.0 (no driver attached)
> em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.35> port
> 0xd800-0xd83f mem 0xe7000000-0xe703ffff,0xe7040000-0xe705ffff irq 11
at> device 12.0 on pci0
> em0: Ethernet address: 00:04:23:b1:d5:92
> em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A
> isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 17.0 on pci0
> isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
> atapci0: <VIA 8235 UDMA133 controller> port
> 0xe800-0xe80f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on
pci0> ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> acpi_tz0: <Thermal Zone> on acpi0
> speaker0: <PC speaker> port 0x61 on acpi0
> fdc0: <floppy drive controller> port 0x3f7,0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on
> acpi0
> atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
> atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
> kbd0 at atkbd0
> pmtimer0 on isa0
> orm0: <ISA Option ROMs> at iomem 0xcc000-0xcc7ff,0xc0000-0xc87ff on
isa0> sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
> vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on
isa0> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1470010559 Hz quality 800
> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
> ad0: 114473MB <ST3120024A/3.33> [232581/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> ad1: 39083MB <Maxtor 4D040H2/DAH017K0> [79408/16/63] at ata0-slave
UDMA100> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad1s1a
> WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
> WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted
> WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted
> WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted
> /var: mount pending error: blocks 20 files 1
> WARNING: /opt was not properly dismounted
> WARNING: /zbackup was not properly dismounted
> em0: Link is up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
> em0: Link is up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
> pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
> pid 64090 (squid), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
> pid 75212 (squid), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
>
>
> Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>>
>> --On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 18.03.55 +0200 Kay Abendroth
>> <kay.abendroth@raxion.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> today I had another panic on my FreeBSD-Box. The last one occured 4
days>>> ago.
>>>
>>> Please reply if sth. is missing.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Kay
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> What brand is your machine? Can you supply a dmesg?
>>
>> /Palle
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org">>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:26:11 +0400
From: Igor Robul <igorr@speechpro.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <42A6D5D3.10305@speechpro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Matthias Buelow wrote:
>
>
>If that Trustix works for you now well, you'd be careless to migrate
>now. If it works, why change it?
>My experience with the 5.x tree so far is that it's ok for a SOHO or
>private environment but I wouldn't trust it if my money (or job)
>depended on it. Maybe in a year, or two but not now.
>
I use 5-STABLE as our Samba/Courier-IMAP/exim/bugzilla/CVS server in
production environment.
One of problems I have is LanSafe III software for Linux, which worked
fine on FreeBSD 4.X, but does not work as expected on FreeBSD 5.X. But
it also does not work on Mandrake 10.1.
Also we have FreeBSD 5-STABLE internal router, and FreeBSD 5-STABLE
gateway/IPSec + small hosting for some of our sites (in jail (8)).
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
End of freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 113, Issue 5
**********************************************