Hi, In /boot/defaults/loader.conf there's the line: #init_path="[...skip...]:/stand/sysinstall" I wonder if /stand/sysinstall is still appropriate as one of the defaults in the init path. There has been a plan to remove /stand/ altogether after install, or even have it completely replaced by /rescue/. Moreover, a more up-to-date sysinstall is now in /usr/sbin/sysinstall !! Regards, Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
John Baldwin
2005-Feb-22 14:21 UTC
loader.conf: init_path="/stand/sysinstall" appropriate?
On Thursday 17 February 2005 12:30 am, Rob wrote:> Hi, > > In /boot/defaults/loader.conf there's the line: > > #init_path="[...skip...]:/stand/sysinstall" > > I wonder if /stand/sysinstall is still appropriate > as one of the defaults in the init path. > > There has been a plan to remove /stand/ altogether > after install, or even have it completely replaced > by /rescue/. > > Moreover, a more up-to-date sysinstall is now in > /usr/sbin/sysinstall !! > > Regards, > Rob.Installs still use a MFS root filesystem with sysinstall in /stand. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
2005-Jul-03 01:33 UTC
loader.conf: init_path="/stand/sysinstall" appropriate?
Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> writes:> In /boot/defaults/loader.conf there's the line: > > #init_path="[...skip...]:/stand/sysinstall"this line reflects the default init_path hardcoded into sys/kern/init_main.c.> I wonder if /stand/sysinstall is still appropriate > as one of the defaults in the init path.It allows us to use a stock kernel on the installation CDs. DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"