Dmitry Pryanishnikov
2003-Dec-25 11:59 UTC
[SOLVED] RE: [Backtrace] 4.9 and 5.1-RELEASE occasionly panic
Hello!> From: Sten <sten@blinkenlights.nl> > > I'd really love getting rid of most hardcoded memory allocations > in the fbsd kernel, with the main bugger being NMBCLUSTERS, > which one always forgets about untill it's too late :(. > In solaris auto-tuning has been a top priority for a long while, > and propper dynamic tuning should get it right ( or even better ) > in 99% of the cases. People with other needs should be able > to build a custom kernel.You need _not_ to build custom FreeBSD kernel in order to increase NMBCLUSTERS. Both CURRENT and STABLE allows setting it from loader.conf: kern.ipc.nmbufs="32768" # Number of mbufs kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" # Number of mbuf clusters But yes, you have to reboot your system if you want to raise them. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:> > Hello! > > > From: Sten <sten@blinkenlights.nl> > > > > I'd really love getting rid of most hardcoded memory allocations > > in the fbsd kernel, with the main bugger being NMBCLUSTERS, > > which one always forgets about untill it's too late :(. > > In solaris auto-tuning has been a top priority for a long while, > > and propper dynamic tuning should get it right ( or even better ) > > in 99% of the cases. People with other needs should be able > > to build a custom kernel. > > You need _not_ to build custom FreeBSD kernel in order to increase > NMBCLUSTERS. Both CURRENT and STABLE allows setting it from loader.conf: > > kern.ipc.nmbufs="32768" # Number of mbufs > kern.ipc.nmbclusters="16384" # Number of mbuf clusters > > But yes, you have to reboot your system if you want to raise them.true, but my point is that these kind of static limits are kind of silly. I have a machine with plenty of memory, when I start doing serious network traffic it dies, ecause freebsd doesn't use available memory. Static allocations are suboptimal and in corner cases they lead to loss of network connectivity or crashes. I do know that fixing these problems is a lot of work, which is why I suggested it as a goal for 6.0. to throw in a fully innapropriate quote : <Linus> In other words, it's ok for a developer to say: "Ok, what happens if you do the above echo?" to figure out whether maybe the problem is due to excessive spurgel-production in the VM frobnicator, but it is NOT OK to say "you can tweak it for your use, so don't complain about the bad behaviour" -- Sten Spans "There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in." Leonard Cohen - Anthem