freebsd stable - Mar 2003 - make release without a lot of the base system

Hi,

I'm trying to make a release of RELENG_4 that doesn't include a lot of
options
from the base system. I have this in the chroot environment's
/etc/make.conf:

----->8------>8------>8-----

#
# /etc/make.conf for chroot release build environment.
#

# We're not in the USA.
USA_RESIDENT=	no

# Do not build various parts of the system that we either provide from
# ports, or do not need at all.
NO_BIND=	true
NO_FORTRAN=	true
NO_I4B=		true
NO_IPFILTER=	true
NO_LPR=		true
NO_OBJC=	true
NOSECURE=	true
NO_OPENSSH=	true
NO_OPENSSL=	true
NO_X=		true
NOPERL=		true
NOUUCP=		true

----->8------>8------>8-----

The first buildworld, done before make release, was done without any
NO_* options, so the populated environment is pretty standard.

The problem is, make release always fails at the chroot buildworld stage,
when trying to 'make depend' in kerberosIV stuff, because it's
missing
openssl headers:

----->8------>8------>8-----

===> kerberosIV/lib/libkrb
ln -sf /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libkrb/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/include/protos.
H protos.h
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a ...

[A LOT OF FILENAMES SNIPPED]

In file included from
/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libkrb/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/krb/krb_locl.h:126,
                 from
/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libkrb/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/krb/check_time.c:34:
/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libkrb/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/krb/krb.h:52:
openssl/des.h: No such file or directory

[LOTS OF REPEATS OF THIS EXACT SAME ERROR]

----->8------>8------>8-----

First, should even kerberos be built with the NO* options above? I don't
think it makes much sense to do so, but then again I have never done anything
with kerberos.

Second, I have tried adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=no to make.conf but that doesn't
appear to make a difference. What's the correct option in /etc/make.conf to
skip building kerberos 4 and 5?

I also tried building without NOSECURE=yes but that also got me an error.
Unfortunately I assumed it was because you couldn't build secure sources
without OPENSSL/OPENSSH so I forgot to note the error. I can try to
reproduce it if it's needed.

--Stijn

-- 
Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20030327/dc5d8aa3/attachment.bin

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Stijn Hoop
wrote:
> First, should even kerberos be built with the NO* options above? 
No, it should not.  Defining NOCRYPT or NO_OPENSSL will prevent the
kerberosIV directory from being entered during the build.

[...]
> Second, I have tried adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=no to make.conf but that
doesn't
> appear to make a difference. What's the correct option in
/etc/make.conf to
> skip building kerberos 4 and 5?
Don't do that.  The correct option is not to define MAKE_KERBEROS[45]
at all.  The value does not matter ... if it is defined, it will be
read as `make it please'.

I would guess that your flags aren't getting propogated as you think.
*shrug*

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org>          http://www.celabo.org/
NTT/Verio SME          .     FreeBSD UNIX     .       Heimdal Kerberos
jvidrine@verio.net     .  nectar@FreeBSD.org  .          nectar@kth.se

Stijn Hoop wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to make a release of RELENG_4 that doesn't include a lot
of options
> from the base system. I have this in the chroot environment's
/etc/make.conf:

<snip>
> Second, I have tried adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=no to make.conf but that
doesn't
> appear to make a difference. What's the correct option in
/etc/make.conf to
> skip building kerberos 4 and 5?
> 
The solution is not in the make.conf, but:

make release BUILDNAME=... NOKERBEROS=true

Or define NOKERBEROS in src/release/Makefile.

> --Stijn
> 
Claude Buisson

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0600, Robert Garrett
wrote:
> Not that my opinion matters but shouldn't this point to all the
variables
> in /etc/defaults/make.conf? as they would all be applicable in this
instance?
Well yes they are applicable of course, but I thought the distinction was that
defaults/make.conf documented all variables having to do with
buildworld/installworld, while release(7) documented variables that affected
solely the release build process. NOKERBEROS is only used in the release
Makefile.

--Stijn

-- 
Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20030327/dd6d579d/attachment.bin