Jamie Landeg-Jones
2017-Dec-11 21:29 UTC
http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs
Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel at gmail.com> wrote:> Why doesn't everyone have that option? Why is broadcasting a users information > across the internet forced upon them? Shouldn't they have a choice?They do! HTTPS already exists! This thread is about removing HTTP and forcing HTTPS - "Why should HTTPS be forced upon them? Shouldn't they have a choice?" :-) | 21:16 (4) "/tmp" root at lapcat# svn export https://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/usr.bin/fortune | A fortune | A fortune/datfiles | | [ ... ] | | A fortune/tools/Troff.sed | Exported revision 326782. Voila! A https delivery of "fortune" ! (Confirmed via tcpdump not to be using fallback HTTP) cheers!
Yonas Yanfa
2017-Dec-11 22:40 UTC
http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs
On 12/11/2017 16:29, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:> Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why doesn't everyone have that option? Why is broadcasting a users information >> across the internet forced upon them? Shouldn't they have a choice? > They do! HTTPS already exists! > > This thread is about removing HTTP and forcing HTTPS - "Why should > HTTPS be forced upon them? Shouldn't they have a choice?" > > :-) > > | 21:16 (4) "/tmp" root at lapcat# svn export https://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/usr.bin/fortune > | A fortune > | A fortune/datfiles > | > | [ ... ] > | > | A fortune/tools/Troff.sed > | Exported revision 326782. > > Voila! A https delivery of "fortune" ! (Confirmed via tcpdump not to be > using fallback HTTP) > > cheers!Yuri, I prefer HTTPS over HTTP as well, but wouldn't switching over to git and using signed commits be even more secure than using HTTPS? Yonas