On 12 Jan 2017, at 19:02, Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen at FreeBSD.org> wrote:> > Has anyone had time to discuss and form a plan for OpenSSL in stable/10, > now that 1.0.1 is end-of-life? I don't recall seeing any public > discussion or announcement; forgive me if I missed it.Would updating to 1.0.2 change the API and/or ABI? -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20170112/1cdab31c/attachment.sig>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:57:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:> On 12 Jan 2017, at 19:02, Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > Has anyone had time to discuss and form a plan for OpenSSL in stable/10, > > now that 1.0.1 is end-of-life? I don't recall seeing any public > > discussion or announcement; forgive me if I missed it. > > Would updating to 1.0.2 change the API and/or ABI?IIRC upstream claims that it is ABI and API compatible, but they were less good about enforcing that rigorously back then than they are now, so maybe some things slipped through the cracks. -Ben