Hi,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
wrote:> Are there any security reasons as to why
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142258 ?([patch] rtld(1): add
> ability to log or print rtld errors)
>
> would not have been committed to the tree ?
I've added kib@ to Cc list.
It doesn't seem to me that this proposed change would do something
with security? Personally I think the change is reasonable (but we
may want printf be replaced with _rtld_error in rtld.c and use
LD_UTRACE there?)
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die