On 03/22/11 23:41, NEHA GUPTA wrote:>
> *>> Generally-speaking, no. Because the cache files are architecture
dependent.*
>
> My understanding was cache file names are architecture dependent but not
the
> content of cache file, Isn''t it so ?
>
> Cache file just have FcPattern like information which would be independent
of
> architecture.
The exact binary format of the contents is arch dependent. This has been
improved on master. If the two architectures assume the same arch suffix,
then the cache files can indeed be shared. Not otherwise.
behdad