I had a couple of thoughts over the weekend about what fontconfig places
in cache files for filenames, and how cache files are managed.
1. Moving cache files to /var/cache means that caches are not path
relative, which is to say they have a specific relation to an
absolute path.
2. In-tree cache files are "bad" for packaging and many other
things.
3. Filename handling in fontconfig is a kludgy mess
Mixing these two statements together, I''m wondering if it makes sense
to
A. Allow cache files *only* in /var/cache or ~/.fonts.cache-2
B. Put absolute path names in the cache files
Does this make sense? Or am I just crazy?
--
keith.packard@intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20060426/e8c444f0/attachment.pgp